Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23648085›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2013

Neural circuits and motivational processes for hunger.

Scott M Sternson, J Nicholas Betley, Zhen Fang Huang Cao

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. dCA1 cells encode and update contextual place preference.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. VMHvllNeuron · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Orexin, serotonin, and energy balance.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. NIH Workshop Report: sensory nutrition and disease.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Scott M SternsonJanelia Farm Research Campus, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA. sternsons@janelia.hhmi.org
J Nicholas Betley
Zhen Fang Huang Cao
Janelia Research Campus · USHelix (United States) · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How does an organism's internal state direct its actions? At one moment an animal forages for food with acrobatic feats such as tree climbing and jumping between branches. At another time, it travels along the ground to find water or a mate, exposing itself to predators along the way. These behaviors are costly in terms of energy or physical risk, and the likelihood of performing one set of actions relative to another is strongly modulated by internal state. For example, an animal in energy deficit searches for food and a dehydrated animal looks for water. The crosstalk between physiological state and motivational processes influences behavioral intensity and intent, but the underlying neural circuits are poorly understood. Molecular genetics along with optogenetic and pharmacogenetic tools for perturbing neuron function have enabled cell type-selective dissection of circuits that mediate behavioral responses to physiological state changes. Here, we review recent progress into neural circuit analysis of hunger in the mouse by focusing on a starvation-sensitive neuron population in the hypothalamus that is sufficient to promote voracious eating. We also consider research into the motivational processes that are thought to underlie hunger in order to outline considerations for bridging the gap between homeostatic and motivational neural circuits.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehaviorEatingHumansHungerMiceMotivationNeural PathwaysNeurons

Identifiers

PMID23648085
PMCPMC3948161
OpenAlexW1971104905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.