Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23647573›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2013

That which does not kill me makes me stronger; combining ERK1/2 pathway inhibitors and BH3 mimetics to kill tumour cells and prevent acquired resistance.

Matthew J Sale, Simon J Cook

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Emerging therapeutic aspects in oncology.British journal of pharmacology · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew J SaleSignalling Laboratory, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, UK. matthew.sale@babraham.ac.uk
Simon J Cook
Babraham Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E02162X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/B/0000C199Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/B/0000H151Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/B/0000H248Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/B/000C0419Cancer Research UK 14867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledOncogenic mutations in RAS or BRAF can drive the inappropriate activation of the ERK1/2. In many cases, tumour cells adapt to become addicted to this deregulated ERK1/2 signalling for their proliferation, providing a therapeutic window for tumour-selective growth inhibition. As a result, inhibition of ERK1/2 signalling by BRAF or MEK1/2 inhibitors is an attractive therapeutic strategy. Indeed, the first BRAF inhibitor, vemurafenib, has now been approved for clinical use, while clinical evaluation of MEK1/2 inhibitors is at an advanced stage. Despite this progress, it is apparent that tumour cells adapt quickly to these new targeted agents so that tumours with acquired resistance can emerge within 6-9 months of primary treatment. One of the major reasons for this is that tumour cells typically respond to BRAF or MEK1/2 inhibitors by undergoing a G1 cell cycle arrest rather than dying. Indeed, although inhibition of ERK1/2 invariably increases the expression of pro-apoptotic BCL2 family proteins, tumour cells undergo minimal apoptosis. This cytostatic response may simply provide the cell with the opportunity to adapt and acquire resistance. Here we discuss recent studies that demonstrate that combination of BRAF or MEK1/2 inhibitors with inhibitors of pro-survival BCL2 proteins is synthetic lethal for ERK1/2-addicted tumour cells. This combination effectively transforms the cytostatic response of BRAF and MEK1/2 inhibitors into a striking apoptotic cell death response. This not only augments the primary efficacy of BRAF and MEK1/2 inhibitors but delays the onset of acquired resistance to these agents, validating their combination in the clinic. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Emerging Therapeutic Aspects in Oncology. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2013.169.issue-8.

Indexed as

Aniline CompoundsAnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsApoptosisApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsBenzamidesCell CycleCell Line, TumorDown-RegulationDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansImatinib MesylateIndolesMAP Kinase Kinase 1MAP Kinase Signaling SystemMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3Aniline CompoundsApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsBenzamidesBRAF protein, humanImatinib MesylateIndolesMAP Kinase Kinase 1Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3navitoclaxPiperazinesProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafPyrimidinesSulfonamidesVemurafenibacquired resistanceapoptosisBCL2BRAFcancerERK1/2MEK1/2RAStargeted therapeutics

Identifiers

PMID23647573
PMCPMC3753831
OpenAlexW1916509051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.