Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23646064›Full record

ArticleFuture virology2012

Reactions, beliefs and concerns associated with providing hair specimens for medical research among a South African sample: a qualitative approach.

Bronwyne Coetzee, Ashraf Kagee, Mark Tomlinson, Louise Warnich, Ogechi Ikediobi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future virology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Applying minimally invasive biomarkers of chronic stress across complex ecological contexts.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bronwyne CoetzeeStellenbosch University, Department of Psychology, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Ashraf Kagee
Mark Tomlinson
Louise Warnich
Ogechi Ikediobi

Funding

Innovative methods for measuring antiretroviral exposureR01AI065233 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GREENBLATT, RUTH MARTHA · 2005 to 2010
$2.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI065233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to optimize treatment outcome among antiretroviral therapy users, there is a strong imperative to engage in continued monitoring and maintenance of therapeutic drug levels in patients. The aim of this study was to document the perspectives, beliefs, and concerns of South African antiretroviral therapy users providing hair specimens to determine antiretroviral drug levels. Twenty-one women living with HIV were recruited from a community health center in the Western Cape. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and analyzed using Atlas.ti version 6. Although participants identified several cultural beliefs influencing their decision to provide hair specimens for drug level measurement, nearly all agreed that they would be willing to do so if provided with enough information by the researcher.

Indexed as

adherenceantiretroviral therapybarriersculturedrug testinghair

Identifiers

PMID23646064
PMCPMC3640774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.