ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2013
Diagnostic laparoscopy in the era of modern imaging--retrospective analysis from a single center.
Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of diagnostic laparoscopy results in Turkish patients with unexplained ascites.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic surgery for the diagnosis of abdominal effusion in the modern era of imaging - a retrospective study in a low-to-middle-income country.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA retrospective analysis of utility and outcomes of diagnostic laparoscopy at our center in the last 5 years was done. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn the last 5 years, we subjected 90 patients to diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) when final diagnosis could not be achieved after all necessary imaging methods and serological, cytological, and microbiological investigations. DL was performed under sedation and local anesthesia, and patients were discharged within 24 h. Video documentation along with guided biopsies/collection of the samples for culture and other tests was performed.
resultsThe commonest indication was ascites (46/90), followed by diffuse liver disease (15), focal liver disease (9), intraabdominal malignancies (10), and miscellaneous (10). Overall accuracy of DL was 91 %. In 64 % of patients, laparoscopy confirmed the clinical diagnosis, and in 27 % of patients, laparoscopy was useful in correcting the diagnosis. DL was performed in 46 patients with low-serum ascitic fluid albumin gradient ascites and ascites of mixed etiology. DL confirmed the suspected diagnosis in 48 %, corrected in 38 %, and yielded unsuspected diagnosis in 15 % patients. In 6 % of patients, laparoscopy was inconclusive. In three patients, there were extensive intraperitoneal adhesions, and adequate examination was not possible. No serious complications were encountered. Minor complications of pain at the port site, ascitic fluid leakage, and port site infection were seen in three, two, and one patient, respectively.
conclusionDL is useful in patients when diagnosis and extent of the disease were unclear especially in ascites of undetermined etiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.