ArticleInvestigational new drugs2014
A phase I study of the oral gamma secretase inhibitor R04929097 in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors (PHL-078/CTEP 8575).
Article in Investigational new drugs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Activity of the γ-Secretase Inhibitor PF-03084014 in Adults With Desmoid Tumors (Aggressive Fibromatosis).Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2017Trial
- A phase II study of the gamma secretase inhibitor RO4929097 in patients with previously treated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Investigational new drugs · 2014Trial
- Cell differentiation-related signaling pathways: biological functions, diseases and therapeutic targets.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Cancer signaling networks in tumor progression and drug resistance: Crosstalk, adaptive reprogramming and therapeutic targeting (Review).Oncology reports · 2026Review
- Canonical and noncanonical NOTCH signaling in the nongenetic resistance of cancer: distinct and concerted control.Frontiers of medicine · 2025Review
- Oncofetal reprogramming in tumor development and progression: novel insights into cancer therapy.MedComm · 2023Review
- Therapeutic vulnerabilities of cancer stem cells and effects of natural products.Natural product reports · 2023Review
- NOTCH Signaling in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Biological and Clinical Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- The critical role of γ-secretase and its inhibitors in cancer and cancer therapeutics.International journal of biological sciences · 2023Review
- Identification, Culture and Targeting of Cancer Stem Cells.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Impact of somatic mutations on clinical and pathologic outcomes in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy followed by surgical resection.Radiation oncology journal · 2021Article
- Targeting Notch to Maximize Chemotherapeutic Benefits: Rationale, Advanced Strategies, and Future Perspectives.Cancers · 2021Review
- MYH9 is crucial for stem cell-like properties in non-small cell lung cancer by activating mTOR signaling.Cell death discovery · 2021Article
- Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: State-of-the-Art and Therapeutic Opportunities.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Gamma Secretase Inhibitors in Cancer: A Current Perspective on Clinical Performance.The oncologist · 2021Review
- NOTCH signalling in ovarian cancer angiogenesis.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Review
- A phase I study of an oral selective gamma secretase (GS) inhibitor RO4929097 in combination with neoadjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin in triple negative breast cancer.Investigational new drugs · 2020Article
- Top Notch Targeting Strategies in Cancer: A Detailed Overview of Recent Insights and Current Perspectives.Cells · 2020Review
- Targeting signalling pathways and the immune microenvironment of cancer stem cells - a clinical update.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2020Review
- Targeting cancer stem cell pathways for cancer therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo establish the recommended phase II dose of the oral γ-secretase inhibitor RO4929097 (RO) in combination with gemcitabine; secondary objectives include the evaluation of safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, biomarkers of Notch signaling and preliminary anti-tumor activity.
methodsPatients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled in cohorts of escalating RO dose levels (DLs). Tested RO DLs were 20 mg, 30 mg, 45 mg and 90 mg. RO was administered orally, once daily on days 1-3, 8-10, 15-17, 22-24. Gemcitabine was administered at 1,000 mg/m(2) on d1, 8, and 15 in 28 d cycles. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed by CTCAE v4. Serial plasma was collected for RO (total and unbound) and gemcitabine pharmacokinetic analysis. Biomarkers of Notch signaling were assessed by immunohistochemistry in archival tissue. Antitumor activity was evaluated (RECIST 1.1).
resultsA total of 18 patients were enrolled to establish the recommended phase II dose. Of these, 3 patients received 20 mg RO, 7 patients received 30 mg RO, 6 patients received 45 mg RO and 2 patients received 90 mg RO. DLTs were grade 3 transaminitis (30 mg RO), grade 3 transaminitis and maculopapular rash (45 mg RO), and grade 3 transaminitis and failure to receive 75 % of planned RO doses secondary to prolonged neutropenia (90 mg); all were reversible. The maximum tolerated dose was exceeded at 90 mg RO. Pharmacokinetic analysis of both total and free RO confirmed the presence of autoinduction at 45 and 90 mg. Median levels of Notch3 staining were higher in individuals who received fewer than 4 cycles (p = 0.029). Circulating angiogenic factor levels did not correlate with time to progression or ≥ grade 3 adverse events. Best response (RECIST 1.1) was partial response (nasopharyngeal cancer) and stable disease > 4 months was observed in 3 patients (pancreas, tracheal, and breast primary cancers).
conclusionsRO and gemcitabine can be safely combined. The recommended phase II dose of RO was 30 mg in combination with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2). Although RO exposure was limited by the presence of autoinduction, RO levels achieved exceeded the area under the concentration-time curve for 0-24 h (AUC(0-24)) predicted for efficacy in preclinical models using daily dosing. Evidence of clinical antitumor activity and prolonged stable disease were identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.