Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23645215›Full record

ReviewBioengineered

Recombinant bacterial amylopullulanases: developments and perspectives.

M Nisha, T Satyanarayana

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineered. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Structure and function of α-glucan debranching enzymes.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Cold and Hot Extremozymes: Industrial Relevance and Current Trends.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M NishaDepartment of Microbiology; University of Delhi South Campus; New Delhi, India.
T SatyanarayanaDepartment of Microbiology; University of Delhi South Campus; New Delhi, India.
University of Delhi · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pullulanases are endo-acting enzymes capable of hydrolyzing α-1, 6-glycosidic linkages in starch, pullulan, amylopectin, and related oligosaccharides, while amylopullulanases are bifunctional enzymes with an active site capable of cleaving both α-1, 4 and α-1, 6 linkages in starch, amylose and other oligosaccharides, and α-1, 6 linkages in pullulan. The amylopullulanases are classified in GH13 and GH57 family enzymes based on the architecture of catalytic domain and number of conserved sequences. The enzymes with two active sites, one for the hydrolysis of α-1, 4- glycosidic bond and the other for α-1, 6-glycosidic bond, are called α-amylase-pullulanases, while amylopullulanases have only one active site for cleaving both α-1, 4- and α-1, 6-glycosidic bonds. The amylopullulanases produced by bacteria find applications in the starch and baking industries as a catalyst for one step starch liquefaction-saccharification for making various sugar syrups, as antistaling agent in bread and as a detergent additive.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAmylopectinBacteriaBacterial ProteinsCatalytic DomainConserved SequenceGlucansGlycoside HydrolasesMolecular Sequence DataRecombinant ProteinsStarchAmylopectinamylopullulanaseBacterial ProteinsGlucansGlycoside HydrolasespullulanRecombinant ProteinsStarchamylase-pullulanaseamylopullulanasepullulansite directed mutagenesisstarchsugar syrupsthermostability

Identifiers

PMID23645215
PMCPMC3937200
OpenAlexW2329337071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.