ReviewAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2013
Progesterone is not the same as 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate: implications for obstetrical practice.
Review in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- Progestogens for maintenance tocolysis in symptomatic women. A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- 17-Hydroxyprogesterone caproate in triplet pregnancy: an individual patient data meta-analysis.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2016Pooled it
- Pharmacokinetics of vaginal progesterone in pregnancy.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2019Trial
- Challenges in Using Progestin to Prevent Singleton Preterm Births: Current Knowledge and Clinical Advice.International journal of women's health · 2024Review
- The end is where we start from: withdrawal of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate to prevent recurrent preterm birth.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2024Article
- Addressing a broken drug pipeline for preterm birth: why early preterm birth is an orphan disease.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2023Article
- What now? A critical evaluation of over 20 years of clinical and research experience with 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate for recurrent preterm birth prevention.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2023Review
- Advances and challenges in studying the tissue-resident T cell compartment in the human female reproductive tract.Immunological reviews · 2023Review
- Article
- Review
- In utero exposure to 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate and risk of cancer in offspring.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2022Article
- Vaginal progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in asymptomatic high-risk women with a normal cervical length: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.Systematic reviews · 2021Article
- Micronized vaginal progesterone to prevent miscarriage: a critical evaluation of randomized evidence.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2020Review
- Developmental exposure to 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate impairs adult delayed reinforcement and reversal learning in male and female rats.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2020Article
- Controversies about the Secondary Prevention of Spontaneous Preterm Birth.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2018Article
- Mid-Luteal 17-OH Progesterone Levels in 614 Women Undergoing IVF-Treatment and Fresh Embryo Transfer-Daytime Variation and Impact on Live Birth Rates.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2018Article
- Evaluating progestogens for prevention of preterm birth international collaborative (EPPPIC) individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis: protocol.Systematic reviews · 2017Article
- 17-alpha Hydroxyprogesterone caproate did not reduce the rate of recurrent preterm birth in a prospective cohort study.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2017Article
- Recent advances in the prevention of preterm birth.F1000Research · 2017Review
- Recurrent pregnancy loss: current perspectives.International journal of women's health · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.