Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23643377›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2013

eXclusion: toward integrating the X chromosome in genome-wide association analyses.

Anastasia L Wise, Lin Gyi, Teri A Manolio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sex Bias in Autoimmunity: New Findings and New Opportunities.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2025
    Review
  19. Genetic Analysis of the X Chromosome Associates Loci with Progression of Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anastasia L WiseNational Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), Bethesda, MD, USA. anastasia.wise@nih.gov
Lin Gyi
Teri A Manolio

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The X chromosome lags behind autosomal chromosomes in genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings. Indeed, the X chromosome is commonly excluded from GWAS analyses despite being assayed on all current GWAS microarray platforms. This raises the question: why are so few hits reported on the X chromosome? This commentary aims to examine this question through review of the current X chromosome results in the National Human Genome Research Institute Catalog of Published Genome-Wide Association Studies (NHGRI GWAS Catalog). It will also investigate commonly cited reasons for exclusion of the X chromosome from GWAS and review the tools currently available for X chromosome analysis. It will conclude with recommendations for incorporating X chromosome analyses in future studies.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, XDatabases, GeneticGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23643377
PMCPMC3644627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.