Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23641781›Full record

ArticleBMC cell biology2013

Cell metabolism sets the differences between subpopulations of satellite cells (SCs).

Andrea Repele, Ramona Lupi, Simon Eaton, Luca Urbani, Paolo De Coppi, Michelangelo Campanella

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cell biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea RepeleStem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Lab, Department of Woman and Child Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Ramona Lupi
Simon Eaton
Luca Urbani
Paolo De Coppi
Michelangelo Campanella
European Brain Research Institute · ITUniversity of Padua · ITGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I013695/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe have recently characterized two distinct populations of Satellite Cells (SCs) that differ in proliferation, regenerative potential, and mitochondrial coupling efficiency and classified these in Low Proliferative Clones (LPC) and High Proliferative Clones (HPC). Herewith, we have investigated their cell metabolism and individuated features that remark an intrinsic difference in basal physiology but that are retrievable also at the initial phases of their cloning.

resultsIndeed, LPC and HPC can be distinguished for mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) just after isolation from the fiber. This is matched by mitochondrial redox state measured via NAD⁺/NADH analysis and alternative respiratory CO₂ production in cloned cells. All these parameters are accountable for metabolic differences reflected indeed by alternative expression of the glycolytic enzyme 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3 (Pfkfb3). Also Ca²⁺ handling by mitochondria is different together with the sensitivity to apoptosis triggered via this pathway. Finally, according to the above, we were able to determine which one among the clones represents the suitable stem cell.

conclusionsThese experimental observations report novel physiological features in the cell biology of SCs and refer to an intrinsic heterogeneity within which their stemness may reside.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationAdenosine TriphosphateAnimalsCalciumCarbon DioxideCells, CulturedMembrane Potential, MitochondrialMitochondria, MuscleModels, AnimalNADPhosphofructokinase-2RatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReactive Oxygen SpeciesRegenerationSatellite Cells, Skeletal MuscleAdenosine TriphosphateCalciumCarbon DioxideNADPfkfb3 protein, ratPhosphofructokinase-2Reactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID23641781
PMCPMC3689622
OpenAlexW1965275538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.