Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23641755›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2013

Characterization of the biofilm forming ability of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius from dogs.

Ameet Singh, Meagan Walker, Joyce Rousseau, Jeffrey Scott Weese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Veterinary sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  9. Investigation on biofilm composition and virulence traits of S. pseudintermedius isolated from infected and colonized dogs.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  10. Effects ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Inhibition ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Virulence Potential of Biofilm-ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Exploring the Biofilm Formation Capacity inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Anti-Staphylococcal Activity ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Antibiotic Resistance Profile and Biofilm Production ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ameet SinghDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada. amsingh@uoguelph.ca
Meagan Walker
Joyce Rousseau
Jeffrey Scott Weese

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStaphylococcus pseudintermedius is an opportunistic pathogen of dogs and has emerged as a leading cause of skin, wound and surgical site infections worldwide. Methicillin resistance is common and clinical infections as a result of methicillin-resistant S. pseudintermedius (MRSP) pose a clinical challenge. In other staphylococci, biofilm formation has been shown to be a virulence factor for infection, however, it has received little attention in S. pseudintermedius. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the biofilm forming ability of clinical isolates of S. pseudintermedius obtained from dogs using phenotypic and genotypic techniques.

results96% (136/140) of S. pseudintermedius isolates were classified as strong or moderate biofilm producers, with the majority of isolates being able to produce biofilm. There was no difference in biofilm formation between MRSP and MSSP (p=0.8), amongst isolates from clinical infections compared with isolates obtained from colonized dogs (p=0.08), and between isolates from sequence type (ST) 71 and ST 68 (P=0.09). icaA was detected in 77.9% (109/140) of isolates and icaD was detected in 75.7% (106/140) of isolates. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of S. pseudintermedius biofilm production revealed aggregates of cocci and irregularly produced extracellular polymeric matrix.

conclusionThe majority of S. pseudintermedius isolates evaluated in this study were able to produce biofilm and this may be an important virulence factor in the rapid emergence of this bacterium in veterinary hospitals worldwide. Further study into the mechanisms of biofilm formation by S. pseudintermedius is warranted.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriological TechniquesBiofilmsDNA, BacterialDog DiseasesDogsGenes, BacterialMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPhenotypeReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcusDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID23641755
PMCPMC3681638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.