SynthesisDrug safety2013
Strategies to improve adverse drug reaction reporting: a critical and systematic review.
Synthesis in Drug safety, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Empowering citizens to spontaneously report suspected adverse drug reaction: Systematic literature review of interventions and their impact.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Improving adverse drug event reporting by healthcare professionals.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Educational interventions in pharmacovigilance to improve the knowledge, attitude and the report of adverse drug reactions in healthcare professionals: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Understanding Primary Care Physician Vaccination Behaviour: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of an educational intervention to improve adverse drug reaction reporting in physicians: a cluster randomized controlled trial.Drug safety · 2015Trial
- Pharmacovigilance and herbal medicines safety: a cross-sectional study of healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes and practices in selected regions of Tanzania, 2021.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Observational
- Disproportionality Analysis of the Five Most Widespread Neurological Effects of COVID-19 Vaccines from 2021 to 2023: Insights from EudraVigilance.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Barriers to and facilitators of healthcare professionals in ADR reporting in a tertiary care hospital in India.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Oropharyngeal adverse drug reactions: knowledge, attitudes, and practice (KAP) among Italian healthcare professionals and students.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Real-World Safety Profile of Biologic Drugs for Severe Uncontrolled Asthma: A Descriptive Analysis from the Spanish Pharmacovigilance Database.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Data-Driven Identification of Factors That Influence the Quality of Adverse Event Reports: 15-Year Interpretable Machine Learning and Time-Series Analyses of VigiBase and QUEST.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- A Web-Based Tool to Report Adverse Drug Reactions by Community Pharmacists in Australia: Usability Testing Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Prescribed Drugs and Self-Directed Violence: A Descriptive Study in the Spanish Pharmacovigilance Database.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- UK veterinary professionals' perceptions and experiences of adverse drug reaction reporting.The Veterinary record · 2022Article
- Why hospital-based healthcare professionals do not report adverse drug reactions: a mixed methods study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Article
- Strengths and Weaknesses of the Pharmacovigilance Systems in Three Arab Countries: A Mixed-Methods Study Using the WHO Pharmacovigilance Indicators.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Willingness, Attitude, and Associated Factors towards Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting among Healthcare Providers in Mizan Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2022Article
- A National Survey of Community Pharmacists' Viewpoints About Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Hospital Pharmacists in Central China Towards Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderreporting is the major limitation of a voluntary adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting system. Many studies have assessed the effectiveness of different interventions designed to reduce underreporting.
objectiveWe aimed to conduct a critical review of papers that assessed the effectiveness of different strategies to increase ADR reporting, regardless of the health professionals or patients included. DATA SOURCES: Scientific papers were selected after a search of the MEDLINE-PubMed and EMBASE scientific databases up to 7 December 2010. STUDY SELECTION: We included papers in English, French or Spanish that analysed an intervention aimed at increasing the number of reported ADRs, and quantify the results of the intervention in terms of number of reports. DATA EXTRACTION: The abstracts retrieved in both computerized searches were reviewed independently by two of the authors. Initially selected papers were thoroughly read to evaluate if they met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data in finally selected papers were independently extracted by both authors and set in pre-designed tables. A third author took the final decision in case of disagreement. For each study, we analysed study design, type of intervention, assessment period, and results of the intervention.
resultsOf the 4,221 papers located that fulfilled the search criteria, 43 met the selection criteria. With the exception of one study, the interventions assessed were deemed to be effective. The vast majority of papers displayed methodological and formal limitations that lowered the grade of evidence. Multiple interventions seem to have had more impact than did single interventions. There were very few cases in which interventions were designed on the basis of inappropriate attitudes and mistaken beliefs about ADRs.
conclusionsIn general, there is a need for studies of better methodological quality in this topic, so that more evidence of the effectiveness of the respective strategies can be collected for the purpose of improving ADR reporting by health professionals. It is probable that multiple interventions cause greater increases in the ADR reporting rates than single.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23640659What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.