Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23640389›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2013

Assessment of DNA damage in Brazilian workers occupationally exposed to pesticides: a study from Central Brazil.

Carolinne Borges Khayat, Emília Oliveira Alves Costa, Macks Wendhell Gonçalves, Damiana Mirian da Cruz e Cunha, Alex Silva da Cruz, Caroline Oliveira de Araújo Melo, Rogério Pereira Bastos, Aparecido Divino da Cruz, Daniela de Melo e Silva

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Farmers exposed to pesticides have almost five times more DNA damage: a meta-analysis study.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Toxicity of Mancozeb Used in Viticulture in Southern Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessment of buccal mucosa genotoxicity in insecticide-exposed urban fumigators in Cali, Colombia.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carolinne Borges KhayatDepartamento de Biologia, Núcleo de Pesquisas Replicon, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás, Rua 235, n. 40, Departamento de Biologia, Bloco L, Área IV, Setor Universitário, Goiânia, Goiás, 74605-050, Brazil.
Emília Oliveira Alves Costa
Macks Wendhell Gonçalves
Damiana Mirian da Cruz e Cunha
Alex Silva da Cruz
Caroline Oliveira de Araújo Melo
Rogério Pereira Bastos
Aparecido Divino da Cruz
Daniela de Melo e Silva
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BRUniversidade Católica de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated 41 rural workers occupationally exposed to pesticides and 32 subjects as a control group, using the micronucleus (MN) and the comet assay. For the comet assay, we evaluated the peripheral blood, and for the MN, we sampled cells from the oral epithelium. Damage to DNA was measured by tail length, % DNA in tail (% tail), olive tail moment (OTM), and tail moment (TM). The exposed group presented an 8× increase in MN frequency, when compared to the control group (p <0.05). When we contrasted the MN frequencies between the individuals that use and do not use personal protective equipment, we found a mean of 7.5 MN (57 % variance) and 12.1 MN (130 % variance), respectively. The binucleated cells were 0.04 and 0.005, in the exposed and control groups, respectively, indicating 8× increase in the number of binucleated cells, when comparing the groups (p <0.05). In the comet assay, we demonstrated statistically significant differences in three parameters (% DNA, OTM, and TM) indicating that the rural workers presented high levels of genomic damages. Our results indicate that occupational exposure to pesticides could cause genome damage in somatic cells, representing a potential health risk to Brazilian rural workers that deal constantly with agrochemicals without adequate personal protection equipment.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAdultAir Pollutants, OccupationalBrazilComet AssayFemaleHumansMaleMicronucleus TestsMiddle AgedOccupational ExposurePesticidesAir Pollutants, OccupationalPesticides

Identifiers

PMID23640389
OpenAlexW1998522267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.