Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23640184›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2013

Challenges in pharmacogenetics.

Ingolf Cascorbi, Oliver Bruhn, Anneke N Werk

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04122729 (Study of the N680S Polymorphism of the FSHR Gene and Its Relationship With the Type of Gonadotropin Used in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04122729 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Study of the N680S Polymorphism of the FSHR Gene and Its Relationship With the Type of Gonadotropin Used in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation

TypeobservationalSponsorAngelini FarmacéuticaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled300ConditionsIn Vitro Fertilization, Controlled Ovarian Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pharmacogenetic and pharmacogenomic discovery strategies.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2019
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ingolf CascorbiInstitute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany. cascorbi@pharmakologie.uni-kiel.de
Oliver Bruhn
Anneke N Werk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The attempt to optimize drug treatment of patients by using evidenced-based medicine considering individual physiological and disease-related conditions is standard of modern medicine. Pharmacogenetics (PGx) has contributed to individualization considering hereditary genetic information; however, increasingly, pharmacogenomics is becoming essential, particularly in relation to modern oncology. New technologies such as next-generation sequencing and rapid development of computational and information sciences will help to better elucidate the consequences of genetic variation, considering also epigenetics and gene-environmental interactions and their translation into clinically relevant individual phenotypes. This review highlights the current challenging and most promising examples of PGx.

Indexed as

PharmacogeneticsAnticoagulantsCardiovascular DiseasesHumansNeoplasmsOrgan TransplantationPainPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPrecision MedicineAnticoagulantsPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.