Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23639899›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2013

Underutilization of Lynch syndrome screening in a multisite study of patients with colorectal cancer.

Deanna S Cross, Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Tia L Kauffman, Jennifer Webster, Anh Quynh Le, Heather Spencer Feigelson, Gwen Alexander, Paul Meier, Adedayo A Onitilo, Pamala A Pawloski and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04533555 (Randomized Trial of Universal vs. Guideline-directed Germline Testing Among Young Adults With Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04533555 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Trial of Universal vs. Guideline-directed Germline Testing Among Young Adults With Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2020 to 2025Enrolled749ConditionsCancerArmsBroad gene panel for young adult cancers, Standard
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cascading After Peridiagnostic Cancer Genetic Testing: An Alternative to Population-Based Screening.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Deanna S CrossMarshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA.
Alanna Kulchak Rahm
Tia L Kauffman
Jennifer Webster
Anh Quynh Le
Heather Spencer Feigelson
Gwen Alexander
Paul Meier
Adedayo A Onitilo
Pamala A Pawloski
Andrew E Williams
Stacey Honda
Yeehwa Daida
Catherine A McCarty
Katrina A B Goddard
CERGEN study team
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USKaiser Permanente · USHenry Ford Health System · USMarshfield Clinic · USEssentia Health · USHealthPartners · US

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
Comparative effectiveness in genomic & personalized medicine for colon cancerUC2CA148471 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GODDARD, KATRINA A., KUSHI, LAWRENCE H · 2010 to 2010
$2.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCI NIH HHS 5UC2CA148471NCI NIH HHS UC2 CA148471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to examine Lynch syndrome screening of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in integrated health-care-delivery organizations.

methodsWe determined the availability of Lynch syndrome screening criteria and actual Lynch syndrome screening in the medical records of 1,188 patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer between 2004 and 2009 at seven institutions in the Cancer Research Network.

resultsWe found infrequent use of Lynch syndrome screening (41/1,188). Family history was available for 937 of the 1,188 patients (79%). There was sufficient information to assess Lynch syndrome risk using family history-based criteria in 719 of the 937 patients (77%) with family history documentation. In 391 individuals with a family history of a Lynch syndrome-associated cancer, 107 (27%) could not be evaluated due to missing information such as age of cancer onset. Eleven percent of patients who met the Bethesda criteria and 25% of individuals who met the Amsterdam II criteria were screened for Lynch syndrome. Recommended guidelines were adhered to during screening, but no testing method was preferred.

conclusionThe information required for Lynch syndrome screening decisions is routinely collected but seldom used. There is a critical gap between collection of family history and its use to guide Lynch syndrome screening, which may support a case for implementation of universal screening guidelines.

Indexed as

AgedColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisData CollectionDelivery of Health CareFamily HealthFemaleGenetic TestingHumansMaleMedical History TakingMedical RecordsMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm MetastasisPractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID23639899
PMCPMC3855589
OpenAlexW1973845571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.