Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23639876›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2013

Remodeling sensory cortical maps implants specific behavioral memory.

K M Bieszczad, A A Miasnikov, N M Weinberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Brief Stimulus Exposure Fully Remediates Temporal Processing Deficits Induced by Early Hearing Loss.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Extinction reverses olfactory fear-conditioned increases in neuron number and glomerular size.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  15. Histone Deacetylase Inhibition via RGFP966 Releases the Brakes on Sensory Cortical Plasticity and the Specificity of Memory Formation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Cortical Synaptic Inhibition Declines during Auditory Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  18. Auditory cortex is required for fear potentiation of gap detection.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K M BieszczadCenter for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3800, United States. kbies@uci.edu
A A Miasnikov
N M Weinberger
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Functions of Associative Auditory Cortical PlasticityR01DC010013 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI WEINBERGER, NORMAN M · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC-010013NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural mechanisms underlying the capacity of memory to be rich in sensory detail are largely unknown. A candidate mechanism is learning-induced plasticity that remodels the adult sensory cortex. Here, expansion in the primary auditory cortical (A1) tonotopic map of rats was induced by pairing a 3.66-kHz tone with activation of the nucleus basalis, mimicking the effects of natural associative learning. Remodeling of A1 produced de novo specific behavioral memory, but neither memory nor plasticity was consistently at the frequency of the paired tone, which typically decreased in A1 representation. Rather, there was a specific match between individual subjects' area of expansion and the tone that was strongest in each animal's memory, as determined by post-training frequency generalization gradients. These findings provide the first demonstration of a match between the artificial induction of specific neural representational plasticity and artificial induction of behavioral memory. As such, together with prior and present findings for detection, correlation and mimicry of plasticity with the acquisition of memory, they satisfy a key criterion for neural substrates of memory. This demonstrates that directly remodeling sensory cortical maps is sufficient for the specificity of memory formation.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory CortexBrain MappingMaleMemoryNeuronal PlasticityRandom AllocationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRespiratory Mechanics

Identifiers

PMID23639876
PMCPMC3691301
OpenAlexW2101845228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.