Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23639590›Full record

ArticleACS chemical neuroscience2013

Assessment of tissue viability following electroosmotic push-pull perfusion from organotypic hippocampal slice cultures.

Amy E Rupert, Y Ou, M Sandberg, S G Weber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Methods of Measuring Enzyme Activity Ex Vivo and In Vivo.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2018
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amy E RupertDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States.
Y Ou
M Sandberg
S G Weber

Funding

SENSITIVE AND SELECTIVE DETECTION OF PEPTIDESR01GM044842 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WEBER, STEPHEN G. · 1991 to 2018
$4.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM044842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a novel sampling technique that allows both introduction and removal of fluid from the extracellular space of living tissue. This method is based on the fluidics of push-pull perfusion but flow is driven by electroosmosis. We have applied this method to organotypic hippocampal cultures. A source capillary is inserted into the tissue and a collection capillary is in contact with the tissue surface through a thin layer of fluid. A voltage is applied across the proximal ends of source and collection capillary. In the applied field, fluid will move from source, into the tissue, and then be collected. In this process, damage to cells may occur. To understand better what sampling conditions influence damage most, we tested various sampling geometries and applied voltages, quantifying damage 16-24 h later using propidium iodide as a cell death marker. We found that damage correlates with both voltage drop and power dissipated in the tissue, but that voltage drop is a better indicator of damage when comparing models in which capillary arrangement and length are different.

Indexed as

Tissue SurvivalAnimalsCell DeathElectric StimulationElectroosmosisHippocampusOrgan Culture TechniquesPerfusionRatsRats, Sprague-Dawley

Identifiers

PMID23639590
PMCPMC3656745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.