ArticleThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2013
P53 codon 72 polymorphism in Taiwanese breast cancer patients.
Article in The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between p53 codon 72 polymorphism and sarcoma risk among Caucasians.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014Pooled it
- Both p53 codon 72 Arg/Arg and pro/Arg genotypes in glioblastoma multiforme are associated with a better prognosis in bevacizumab treatment.BMC cancer · 2020Article
- SNHG1 Long Noncoding RNA is Potentially Up-Regulated in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2020Article
- A Review of the Epidemiology of Breast Cancer in Asia: Focus on Risk Factors.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2020Review
- SNP 1772 C > T of HIF-1α gene associates with breast cancer risk in a Taiwanese population.Cancer cell international · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are clear discrepancies between ethnicity and geographic area regarding the peak age incidence and mortality of breast cancer. Underlying variances include genetic, environmental, and socioeconomic factors. The wild-type p53 codon has two common polymorphic variants from a single-base-pair substitution at codon 72, where either C-C-C encodes proline (p53-p72) or C-G-C encodes arginine (p53-R72). We aim to study the p53 codon 72 genotypes of patients with breast cancer in Taiwan and make a comparison with the published data to ascertain whether any difference exists between Taiwanese and Western patients with breast cancer. We also evaluated the effect of the p53 codon 72 polymorphism on clinicopathologic features. We examined blood from 170 Taiwanese women with breast cancer with polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism for the genotypes of p53 codon 72. For the p53 codon 72 polymorphism, there were 31 p53-P/P72 (18.2%), 93 p53-R/P72 (54.7%), and 46 p53-R/R72 (27.1%) with the allele frequencies 0.54 for the p53-R72 and 0.46 for p53-P72, respectively. Our results indicate that there was more p53-P72 (40.6% in Asians vs. 26.4% in Caucasians) and twice the incidence of p53-P/P72 homozygotes (18% in Asians vs. 8% in Caucasians) among the Asian population. Patients with the p53-R/R72 variant were more likely to have a t1 tumor size status (55.2%) compared with patients with the P53-P/R72 (30.9%) or P53-P/P72 variant (36%). Our results support the hypothesis that genetic factors may contribute to the difference between Taiwanese or Asian breast cancer and Western breast cancer patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.