ArticleBMC public health2013
A framework for stakeholder identification in concept mapping and health research: a novel process and its application to older adult mobility and the built environment.
Article in BMC public health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pre-implementation planning for a sepsis intervention in a large learning health system: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2024Trial
- Antimicrobial resistance in the Northern Territory, Australia: insights from a systems thinking approach to human health.One health outlook · 2026Article
- The Monash learning health system maturity matrix: codesign of a tool to measure and guide improvement in complex health system behaviour.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Identifying social prescribing core outcomes using a Delphi approach: findings and future directions.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2026Article
- The longevity landscape: mapping stakeholder priorities for healthy aging among high-income countries.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Trust, autonomy, and informed consent: a qualitative investigation of youth experiences accessing contraception in Canada.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- How can community-based organizations be involved in the contraception care pathway for newcomer youth? Results of knowledge translation workshops.PEC innovation · 2025Article
- Stakeholders influence to reduce vitamin A deficiency in children aged 15 to 23 months in Iran: an analysis of stakeholders and networking.BMC nutrition · 2025Article
- Digital Health for Equitable Rheumatic Care: Integrating Real-World Experiences to Guide Policy Pathways.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- FUTURE-AI: international consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- Understanding the National Healthcare Ecosystem to Position Medical Affairs as a Strategic Element: Lessons Learned from AstraZeneca Spain.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2025Article
- Contradictions and possibilities for change: Exploring stakeholder perspectives of Canada's Feminist International Assistance Policy (FIAP) and their connection to a future for global health.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Improving childhood cancer medicines access in developing countries: Towards an implementation framework to inform the Global Platform for Access to Childhood Cancer Medicines for Nigeria.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Development of a Hospital-Stakeholder Collaboration Tool Using Mixed Methods to Assess Stakeholder Perspectives for Hospital Service Improvement.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Social Prescribing Outcomes for Trials (SPOT): Protocol for a modified Delphi study on core outcomes.PloS one · 2023Article
- Opportunities and challenges to non-communicable disease (NCD) research and training in Pakistan: a qualitative study from Pakistan.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Supporting deprescribing in long-term care: An approach using stakeholder engagement, behavioural science and implementation planning.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2022Article
- Palliative care stakeholders in Canada.Health research policy and systems · 2022Article
- Identifying essential implementation strategies: a mixed methods process evaluation of a multi-strategy policy implementation intervention for schools.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStakeholders, as originally defined in theory, are groups or individual who can affect or are affected by an issue. Stakeholders are an important source of information in health research, providing critical perspectives and new insights on the complex determinants of health. The intersection of built and social environments with older adult mobility is an area of research that is fundamentally interdisciplinary and would benefit from a better understanding of stakeholder perspectives. Although a rich body of literature surrounds stakeholder theory, a systematic process for identifying health stakeholders in practice does not exist. This paper presents a framework of stakeholders related to older adult mobility and the built environment, and further outlines a process for systematically identifying stakeholders that can be applied in other health contexts, with a particular emphasis on concept mapping research.
methodsInformed by gaps in the relevant literature we developed a framework for identifying and categorizing health stakeholders. The framework was created through a novel iterative process of stakeholder identification and categorization. The development entailed a literature search to identify stakeholder categories, representation of identified stakeholders in a visual chart, and correspondence with expert informants to obtain practice-based insight.
resultsThe three-step, iterative creation process progressed from identifying stakeholder categories, to identifying specific stakeholder groups and soliciting feedback from expert informants. The result was a stakeholder framework comprised of seven categories with detailed sub-groups. The main categories of stakeholders were, (1) the Public, (2) Policy makers and governments, (3) Research community, (4) Practitioners and professionals, (5) Health and social service providers, (6) Civil society organizations, and (7) Private business.
conclusionsStakeholders related to older adult mobility and the built environment span many disciplines and realms of practice. Researchers studying this issue may use the detailed stakeholder framework process we present to identify participants for future projects. Health researchers pursuing stakeholder-based projects in other contexts are encouraged to incorporate this process of stakeholder identification and categorization to ensure systematic consideration of relevant perspectives in their work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.