Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23638883›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2013

Isobaric protein-level labeling strategy for serum glycoprotein quantification analysis by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Song Nie, Andy Lo, Jianhui Zhu, Jing Wu, Mack T Ruffin, David M Lubman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Song NieDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Andy Lo
Jianhui Zhu
Jing Wu
Mack T Ruffin
David M Lubman
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Translational Research in GI CancerP50CA130810 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BRENNER, DEAN E. · 2010 to 2016
$11.8M
Microsequencing in an Ion Trap/reTOF DeviceR01GM049500 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LUBMAN, DAVID M. · 1994 to 2016
$3.0M
Serum glycoprotein markers of cancer using an ion mobility/mass spec approachR01CA154455 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LUBMAN, DAVID M. · 2011 to 2013
$921k
NCI NIH HHS 1 P50CA130810NCI NIH HHS 1 R01 CA154455 01NCI NIH HHS P50 CA130810NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154455NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM049500NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM49500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While peptide-level labeling using isobaric tag reagents has been widely applied for quantitative proteomics experiments, there are comparatively few reports of protein-level labeling. Intact protein labeling could be broadly applied to quantification experiments utilizing protein-level separations or enrichment schemes. Here, protein-level isobaric labeling was explored as an alternative strategy to peptide-level labeling for serum glycoprotein quantification. Labeling and digestion conditions were optimized by comparing different organic solvents and enzymes. Digestions with Asp-N and trypsin were found highly complementary; combining the results enabled quantification of 30% more proteins than either enzyme alone. Three commercial reagents were compared for protein-level labeling. Protein identification rates were highest with iTRAQ 4-plex when compared to TMT 6-plex and iTRAQ 8-plex using higher-energy collisional dissociation on an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer. The compatibility of isobaric protein-level labeling with lectin-based glycoprotein enrichment was also investigated. More than 74% of lectin-bound labeled proteins were known glycoproteins, which was similar to results from unlabeled and peptide-level labeled serum samples. Finally, protein-level and peptide-level labeling strategies were compared for serum glycoprotein quantification. Isobaric protein-level labeling gave comparable identification levels and quantitative precision to peptide-level labeling.

Indexed as

ProteomicsChromatography, LiquidGlycopeptidesGlycoproteinsHumansTandem Mass SpectrometryGlycopeptidesGlycoproteins

Identifiers

PMID23638883
PMCPMC3690282
OpenAlexW2065169042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.