Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23638798›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2013

Death receptors as targets in cancer.

O Micheau, S Shirley, F Dufour

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. E3 ubiquitin ligase geneFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. TRAIL-Sensitizing Effects of Flavonoids in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

O MicheauUMR866, INSERM, Dijon, France. olivier.micheau@inserm.fr
S Shirley
F Dufour

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledAnti-tumour therapies based on the use pro-apoptotic receptor agonists, including TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) or monoclonal antibodies targeting TRAIL-R1 or TRAIL-R2, have been disappointing so far, despite clear evidence of clinical activity and lack of adverse events for the vast majority of these compounds, whether combined or not with conventional or targeted anti-cancer therapies. This brief review aims at discussing the possible reasons for the lack of apparent success of these therapeutic approaches and at providing hints in order to rationally design optimal protocols based on our current understanding of TRAIL signalling regulation or resistance for future clinical trials. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Emerging Therapeutic Aspects in Oncology. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2013.169.issue-8.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsDeath Domain Receptor Signaling Adaptor ProteinsHumansNeoplasmsReceptors, Death DomainRecombinant ProteinsTNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing LigandAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsconatumumabDeath Domain Receptor Signaling Adaptor ProteinsdrozitumablexatumumabReceptors, Death DomainRecombinant ProteinstigatuzumabTNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing LigandTNFSF10 protein, humanapoptosisFasresistancetherapyTNF-receptor superfamilyTRAILtumour targeting

Identifiers

PMID23638798
PMCPMC3753832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.