Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23638348›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2013

Simultaneous recordings of ocular microtremor and microsaccades with a piezoelectric sensor and a video-oculography system.

Michael B McCamy, Niamh Collins, Jorge Otero-Millan, Mohammed Al-Kalbani, Stephen L Macknik, Davis Coakley, Xoana G Troncoso, Gerard Boyle, Vinodh Narayanan, Thomas R Wolf and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Microsaccadic modulation evoked by emotional events.Journal of physiological anthropology · 2020
    Review
  11. VisME: Visual Microsaccades Explorer.Journal of eye movement research · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Unchanging visions: the effects and limitations of ocular stillness.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Highly informative natural scene regions increase microsaccade production during visual scanning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Fixational eye movements and binocular vision.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michael B McCamy *Department of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, USA.
Niamh Collins *Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Jorge Otero-MillanDepartment of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, USA.
Mohammed Al-KalbaniTrinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Stephen L MacknikDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, USA.
Davis CoakleyTrinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Xoana G TroncosoDepartment of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, USA.
Gerard BoyleSt James's Hospital(Medical Physics and Bioengineering Dept.), Ireland.
Vinodh NarayananDepartment of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, USA.
Thomas R WolfNeuro-Ophthalmology Unit, Barrow Neurological Institute, USA.
Susana Martinez-CondeDepartment of Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our eyes are in continuous motion. Even when we attempt to fix our gaze, we produce so called "fixational eye movements", which include microsaccades, drift, and ocular microtremor (OMT). Microsaccades, the largest and fastest type of fixational eye movement, shift the retinal image from several dozen to several hundred photoreceptors and have equivalent physical characteristics to saccades, only on a smaller scale (Martinez-Conde, Otero-Millan & Macknik, 2013). OMT occurs simultaneously with drift and is the smallest of the fixational eye movements (∼1 photoreceptor width, >0.5 arcmin), with dominant frequencies ranging from 70 Hz to 103 Hz (Martinez-Conde, Macknik & Hubel, 2004). Due to OMT's small amplitude and high frequency, the most accurate and stringent way to record it is the piezoelectric transduction method. Thus, OMT studies are far rarer than those focusing on microsaccades or drift. Here we conducted simultaneous recordings of OMT and microsaccades with a piezoelectric device and a commercial infrared video tracking system. We set out to determine whether OMT could help to restore perceptually faded targets during attempted fixation, and we also wondered whether the piezoelectric sensor could affect the characteristics of microsaccades. Our results showed that microsaccades, but not OMT, counteracted perceptual fading. We moreover found that the piezoelectric sensor affected microsaccades in a complex way, and that the oculomotor system adjusted to the stress brought on by the sensor by adjusting the magnitudes of microsaccades.

Indexed as

FadingFixational eye movementsNeural adaptationSaccadic adaptationTremor

Identifiers

PMID23638348
PMCPMC3629042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.