ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2013
Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the oral cavity: immunohistochemical study of four cases.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Primary Cutaneous Cribriform Apocrine Carcinoma: A Case Report and Narrative Review.BioMed (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma of the scalp: dermatosurgical approach with favourable outcome.Dermatology reports · 2022Article
- Downregulation of miR-222 Induces Apoptosis and Cellular Migration in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma Cells.Oncology research · 2017Article
- Aggressive Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of Maxillary Sinus in a 43-Year-Old Male: Rare Case Report and Review of Literature.Case reports in medicine · 2017Article
- The unique luminal staining pattern of cytokeratin 5/6 in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast may aid in differentiating it from its mimickers.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2016Article
- Nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2014Review
- Hydrogen Sulfide and Hydrogen Sulfide-Synthesizing Enzymes Are Altered in a Case of Oral Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma.Case reports in oncologyArticle
- How predominant cell and stroma types harmonize to predict head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma outcomes?Medical journal, Armed Forces IndiaReview
- A review: Immunological markers for malignant salivary gland tumors.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) in the oral cavity is rare, and no immunohistochemical studies of ACC in the oral cavity have been performed. This report describes the immunohistochemical study of four ACCs of the oral cavity. The male to female ratio was 1:3. The age was 43, 51, 59 and 64 years. The location was tongue (n=2), buccal mucosa (n=1), and gingiva (n=1). Histochemically, all ACCs were positive for neutral, carboxylated and sulfated mucins. Immunohistochemically, ACC was consistently positive for cytokeratin (CK) AE1/3, CK 34βE12, CK5/6, CK7, CK14, CK18, p63, CA19-9, c-KIT (CD117), PDGFRA, MUC1, and Ki-67 (labeling index: 5%, 15%, 20% and 40%). ACC was consistently negative for CK8, CK20, desmin, S100 protein, CD34, chromogranin, MUC2, MUC5AC and MUC6. Some ACCs were positive for CK CAM5.2 (3/4), CK19 (1/4), EMA (2/4), CEA (2/4), vimentin (3/4), α-smooth muscle actin (2/4), p53 (2/4), CD10 (2/4), and synaptophysin (1/4). These results may provide basic knowledge of ACC of the oral cavity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23638226PMC3638105W1557656917What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.