Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23638211›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2013

A qualitative study exploring barriers related to use of footwear in rural highland ethiopia: implications for neglected tropical disease control.

Desta Ayode, Colleen M McBride, Hendrik D de Heer, Emi Watanabe, Tsega Gebreyesus, Abebayehu Tora, Getnet Tadele, Gail Davey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Severely stigmatised skin neglected tropical diseases: a protocol for social science engagement.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2020
    Article
  17. Podoconiosis: key priorities for research and implementation.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Podoconiosis today: challenges and opportunities.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Desta AyodeCollege of Social Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Colleen M McBride
Hendrik D de Heer
Emi Watanabe
Tsega Gebreyesus
Abebayehu Tora
Getnet Tadele
Gail Davey

Funding

Promoting Footwear in Rural EthiopiaZIAHG200369 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KOEHLY, LAURA M · 2010 to 2014
$2.1M
Wellcome Trust 100715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of footwear in protection against a range of Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) is gaining increasing attention. Better understanding of the behaviors that influence use of footwear will lead to improved ability to measure shoe use and will be important for those implementing footwear programs. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsUsing the PRECEDE-PROCEED model we assessed social, behavioral, environmental, educational and ecological needs influencing whether and when children wear shoes in a rural highland Ethiopian community endemic for podoconiosis. Information was gathered from 242 respondents using focus groups, semi-structured interviews and extended case studies. Shoe-wearing norms were said to be changing, with going barefoot increasingly seen as 'shameful'. Shoes were thought to confer dignity as well as protection against injury and cold. However, many practical and social barriers prevented the desire to wear shoes from being translated into practice. Limited financial resources meant that people were neither able to purchase more than one pair of shoes to ensure their longevity nor afford shoes of the preferred quality. As a result of this limited access, shoes were typically preserved for special occasions and might not be provided for children until they reached a certain age. While some barriers (for example fit of shoe and fear of labeling through use of a certain type of shoe) may be applicable only to certain diseases, underlying structural level barriers related to poverty (for example price, quality, unsuitability for daily activities and low risk perception) are likely to be relevant to a range of NTDs. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Using well established conceptual models of health behavior adoption, we identified several barriers to shoe wearing that are amenable to intervention and which we anticipate will be of benefit to those considering NTD prevention through shoe distribution.

Indexed as

EthiopiaModels, TheoreticalNeglected DiseasesShoesTropical Climate

Identifiers

PMID23638211
PMCPMC3636134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.