Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23638115›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

A novel injectable calcium phosphate cement-bioactive glass composite for bone regeneration.

Long Yu, Yang Li, Kang Zhao, Yufei Tang, Zhe Cheng, Jun Chen, Yuan Zang, Jianwei Wu, Liang Kong, Shuai Liu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Materials in the NaMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tissue engineering for bone regeneration and osseointegration in the oral cavity.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Scaffold design for bone regeneration.Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology · 2014
    Review
  20. Self-setting calcium orthophosphate formulations.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Long YuInstitute of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, People's Republic of China.
Yang Li
Kang Zhao
Yufei Tang
Zhe Cheng
Jun Chen
Yuan Zang
Jianwei Wu
Liang Kong
Shuai Liu
Wei Lei
Zixiang Wu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCalcium phosphate cement (CPC) can be molded or injected to form a scaffold in situ, which intimately conforms to complex bone defects. Bioactive glass (BG) is known for its unique ability to bond to living bone and promote bone growth. However, it was not until recently that literature was available regarding CPC-BG applied as an injectable graft. In this paper, we reported a novel injectable CPC-BG composite with improved properties caused by the incorporation of BG into CPC. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe novel injectable bioactive cement was evaluated to determine its composition, microstructure, setting time, injectability, compressive strength and behavior in a simulated body fluid (SBF). The in vitro cellular responses of osteoblasts and in vivo tissue responses after the implantation of CPC-BG in femoral condyle defects of rabbits were also investigated.

resultsCPC-BG possessed a retarded setting time and markedly better injectability and mechanical properties than CPC. Moreover, a new Ca-deficient apatite layer was deposited on the composite surface after immersing immersion in SBF for 7 days. CPC-BG samples showed significantly improved degradability and bioactivity compared to CPC in simulated body fluid (SBF). In addition, the degrees of cell attachment, proliferation and differentiation on CPC-BG were higher than those on CPC. Macroscopic evaluation, histological evaluation, and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis showed that CPC-BG enhanced the efficiency of new bone formation in comparison with CPC.

conclusionsA novel CPC-BG composite has been synthesized with improved properties exhibiting promising prospects for bone regeneration.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBiomimeticsBone CementsBone RegenerationCalcium PhosphatesCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCompressive StrengthFemaleFemurGlassHumansInjectionsRabbitsBiocompatible MaterialsBone Cementscalcium phosphateCalcium Phosphates

Identifiers

PMID23638115
PMCPMC3636220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.