Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23638077›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Filling gaps in biodiversity knowledge for macrofungi: contributions and assessment of an herbarium collection DNA barcode sequencing project.

Todd W Osmundson, Vincent A Robert, Conrad L Schoch, Lydia J Baker, Amy Smith, Giovanni Robich, Luca Mizzan, Matteo M Garbelotto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The genusPersoonia · 2026
    Article
  6. Revision of the GenusJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Morphological Diversity and Preliminary DNA Barcoding ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Systematic study ofIMA fungus · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The genusIMA fungus · 2026
    Article
  11. Taxonomic studies onMycoKeys · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Diversity of the GenusJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. New insights intoMycoKeys · 2025
    Article
  20. Additions to theFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Todd W OsmundsonForest Pathology and Mycology Laboratory, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Vincent A Robert
Conrad L Schoch
Lydia J Baker
Amy Smith
Giovanni Robich
Luca Mizzan
Matteo M Garbelotto

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent advances spearheaded by molecular approaches and novel technologies, species description and DNA sequence information are significantly lagging for fungi compared to many other groups of organisms. Large scale sequencing of vouchered herbarium material can aid in closing this gap. Here, we describe an effort to obtain broad ITS sequence coverage of the approximately 6000 macrofungal-species-rich herbarium of the Museum of Natural History in Venice, Italy. Our goals were to investigate issues related to large sequencing projects, develop heuristic methods for assessing the overall performance of such a project, and evaluate the prospects of such efforts to reduce the current gap in fungal biodiversity knowledge. The effort generated 1107 sequences submitted to GenBank, including 416 previously unrepresented taxa and 398 sequences exhibiting a best BLAST match to an unidentified environmental sequence. Specimen age and taxon affected sequencing success, and subsequent work on failed specimens showed that an ITS1 mini-barcode greatly increased sequencing success without greatly reducing the discriminating power of the barcode. Similarity comparisons and nonmetric multidimensional scaling ordinations based on pairwise distance matrices proved to be useful heuristic tools for validating the overall accuracy of specimen identifications, flagging potential misidentifications, and identifying taxa in need of additional species-level revision. Comparison of within- and among-species nucleotide variation showed a strong increase in species discriminating power at 1-2% dissimilarity, and identified potential barcoding issues (same sequence for different species and vice-versa). All sequences are linked to a vouchered specimen, and results from this study have already prompted revisions of species-sequence assignments in several taxa.

Indexed as

BiodiversityDatabases, Nucleic AcidDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, FungalFungiMuseumsPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID23638077
PMCPMC3640088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.