Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23637989›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Circulating brain microvascular endothelial cells (cBMECs) as potential biomarkers of the blood-brain barrier disorders caused by microbial and non-microbial factors.

Sheng-He Huang, Lin Wang, Feng Chi, Chun-Hua Wu, Hong Cao, Aimin Zhang, Ambrose Jong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Understanding the Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Pathology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Advance of Stem Cell Treatment for Traumatic Brain Injury.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Blood biomarkers for brain injury: What are we measuring?Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sheng-He HuangDepartment of Pediatrics, Saban Research Institute of Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America. shhuang@hsc.usc.edu
Lin Wang
Feng Chi
Chun-Hua Wu
Hong Cao
Aimin Zhang
Ambrose Jong
Children's Hospital of Los Angeles · USUniversity of Southern California · US302 Military Hospital of China · CNSouthern Medical University · CN

Funding

Invasion of C. neoformans into brain endothelial cellsR01NS047599 · NINDS · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI JONG, AMBROSE Y · 2004 to 2012
$2.5M
Identification of Biomarkers for BBB Injury-Induced by Drugs and HIV-1 ProteinsR03DA034515 · NIDA · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI HUANG, SHENG-HE · 2013 to 2014
$162k
NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA034515NIDA NIH HHS R03-DA034515NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS047599NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS047599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite aggressive research, central nervous system (CNS) disorders, including blood-brain barrier (BBB) injury caused by microbial infection, stroke, abused drugs [e.g., methamphetamine (METH) and nicotine], and other pathogenic insults, remain the world's leading cause of disabilities. In our previous work, we found that dysfunction of brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs), which are a major component of the BBB, could be caused by nicotine, meningitic pathogens and microbial factors, including HIV-1 virulence factors gp41 and gp120. One of the most challenging issues in this area is that there are no available cell-based biomarkers in peripheral blood for BBB disorders caused by microbial and non-microbial insults. To identify such cellular biomarkers for BBB injuries, our studies have shown that mice treated with nicotine, METH and gp120 resulted in increased blood levels of CD146+(endothelial marker)/S100B+ (brain marker) circulating BMECs (cBMECs) and CD133+[progenitor cell (PC) marker]/CD146+ endothelial PCs (EPCs), along with enhanced Evans blue and albumin extravasation into the brain. Nicotine and gp120 were able to significantly increase the serum levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase 1 (UCHL1) (a new BBB marker) as well as S100B in mice, which are correlated with the changes in cBMECs and EPCs. Nicotine- and meningitic E. coli K1-induced enhancement of cBMEC levels, leukocyte migration across the BBB and albumin extravasation into the brain were significantly reduced in alpha7 nAChR knockout mice, suggesting that this inflammatory regulator plays an important role in CNS inflammation and BBB disorders caused by microbial and non-microbial factors. These results demonstrated that cBMECs as well as EPCs may be used as potential cell-based biomarkers for indexing of BBB injury.

Indexed as

Cell Movementalpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine ReceptorAnimalsBiomarkersBlood-Brain BarrierCell SeparationEndothelial CellsEscherichia coliHIV-1HIV Envelope Protein gp120MagneticsMethamphetamineMiceMicrospheresMicrovesselsModels, Biologicalalpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine ReceptorBiomarkersChrna7 protein, mouseHIV Envelope Protein gp120MethamphetamineNicotineReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID23637989
PMCPMC3637435
OpenAlexW2046936368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.