Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23637963›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Association between gender, process of care measures, and outcomes in ACS in India: results from the detection and management of coronary heart disease (DEMAT) registry.

Neha J Pagidipati, Mark D Huffman, Panniyammakal Jeemon, Rajeev Gupta, Prakash Negi, Thannikot M Jaison, Satyavan Sharma, Nakul Sinha, Padinhare Mohanan, B G Muralidhara and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sex Differences in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Global Perspective.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Gender-basedJournal of cardiovascular and thoracic research · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Neha J PagidipatiCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India. npagidipati@partners.org
Mark D Huffman
Panniyammakal Jeemon
Rajeev Gupta
Prakash Negi
Thannikot M Jaison
Satyavan Sharma
Nakul Sinha
Padinhare Mohanan
B G Muralidhara
Sasidharan Bijulal
Sivasubramonian Sivasankaran
Vijay K Puri
Jacob Jose
K Srinath Reddy
Dorairaj Prabhakaran
Centre for Chronic Disease Control · INChristian Medical College & Hospital · INSree Chitra Thirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology · INBombay Hospital · INFortis Escorts Hospital · INHi-Tech Medical College & Hospital · INIndira Gandhi Medical College · INKing George's Medical University · INPublic Health Foundation of India · INSanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

Fogarty International Clinical Research Scholars Support Center @ Vanderbilt-AAMCR24TW007988 · FIC · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI VERMUND, STEN H. · 2007 to 2011
$27.6M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN CVD EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PREVENTIONT32HL069771 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Mercedes Renee Carnethon · 2003 to 2026
$5.9M
Interdisciplinary research training: NCD epidemiology and prevention in IndiaD43HD065249 · NICHD · CENTRE FOR CHRONIC DISEASE CONTROL · PI NARAYAN, KABAYAM M VENKAT, TANDON, NIKHIL · 2009 to 2013
$1.2M
FIC NIH HHS R24 TW007988FIC NIH HHS R24TW007988NHLBI NIH HHS 5 T32 HL069771-08NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069771NICHD NIH HHS 1D43HD065249NICHD NIH HHS D43 HD065249Wellcome Trust 084754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies from high-income countries have shown that women receive less aggressive diagnostics and treatment than men in acute coronary syndromes (ACS), though their short-term mortality does not appear to differ from men. Data on gender differences in ACS presentation, management, and outcomes are sparse in India. METHODS AND

resultsThe Detection and Management of Coronary Heart Disease (DEMAT) Registry collected data from 1,565 suspected ACS patients (334 women; 1,231 men) from ten tertiary care centers throughout India between 2007-2008. We evaluated gender differences in presentation, in-hospital and discharge management, and 30-day death and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; death, re-hospitalization, and cardiac arrest) rates. Women were less likely to present with STEMI than men (38% vs. 55%, p<0.001). Overall inpatient diagnostics and treatment patterns were similar between men and women after adjustment for potential confounders. Optimal discharge management with aspirin, clopidogrel, beta-blockers, and statin therapy was lower for women than men, (58% vs. 65%, p = 0.03), but these differences were attenuated after adjustment (OR = 0.86 (0.62, 1.19)). Neither the outcome of 30-day mortality (OR = 1.40 (0.62, 3.16)) nor MACE (OR = 1.00 (0.67, 1.48)) differed significantly between men and women after adjustment.

conclusionsACS in-hospital management, discharge management, and 30-day outcomes did not significantly differ between genders in the DEMAT registry, though consistently higher treatment rates and lower event rates in men compared to women were seen. These findings underscore the importance of further investigation of gender differences in cardiovascular care in India.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAmbulatory CareFemaleHumansIndiaInpatientsMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareRegistriesSex FactorsSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID23637963
PMCPMC3634747
OpenAlexW1998163995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.