Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23637120›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2013

EDNRB and DCC salivary rinse hypermethylation has a similar performance as expert clinical examination in discrimination of oral cancer/dysplasia versus benign lesions.

Juliana Schussel, Xian Chong Zhou, Zhe Zhang, Kavita Pattani, Francisco Bermudez, Germain Jean-Charles, Thomas McCaffrey, Tapan Padhya, Joan Phelan, Silvia Spivakovsky and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Leveraging Saliva for Insights into Head and Neck Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Juliana SchusselDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
Xian Chong Zhou
Zhe Zhang
Kavita Pattani
Francisco Bermudez
Germain Jean-Charles
Thomas McCaffrey
Tapan Padhya
Joan Phelan
Silvia Spivakovsky
Mariana Brait
Ryan Li
Helen Yoo Bowne
Judith D Goldberg
Linda Rolnitzky
Miriam Robbins
A Ross Kerr
David Sirois
Joseph A Califano
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USSt. Vincent's Medical Center · USNew York University · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USGreater Baltimore Medical Center · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Puerto Rico System · PR

Funding

Vaccine FacilityP30CA016087 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ADRIANA HEGUY · 1985 to 2026
$83.1M
INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT OF NOVEL MOLECULAR MARKERSU01CA084986 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SIDRANSKY, DAVID · 1999 to 2014
$33.8M
TUMOR SUPPRESOR GENE PROMOTER HYPERMETHYLATION FOR DETECTION OF HEAD AND NECKP50DE019032 · NIDCR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SIDRANSKY, DAVID · 2007 to 2016
$27.1M
RISK OF ORAL EPITHELIAL DYSPLASIA IN PUERTO RICOU54DE014257 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MORSE, DOUGLAS E · 2001 to 2007
$7.3M
Integrative Pathway Analysis of Eqigenomic/transcriptional Alteration in HNSCCRC1DE020324 · NIDCR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CALIFANO, JOSEPH A · 2009 to 2010
$918k
Validation of epigenetic biomarkers of head and neck cancer progression--OLDRC2DE020789 · NIDCR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CALIFANO, JOSEPH A · 2009 to 2010
$546k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016087NCI NIH HHS U01 CA084986NCI NIH HHS U01-CA084986NIDCR NIH HHS 5P50DE019032NIDCR NIH HHS P50 DE019032NIDCR NIH HHS RC1 DE020324NIDCR NIH HHS RC2 DE020789NIDCR NIH HHS U54 DE014257NIDCR NIH HHS U54 DE14257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePromoter hypermethylation has been recently proposed as a means for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) detection in salivary rinses. In a prospective study of a high-risk population, we showed that endothelin receptor type B (EDNRB) promoter methylation in salivary rinses is a useful biomarker for oral cancer and premalignancy. EXPERIMENTAL

designUsing that cohort, we evaluated EDNRB methylation status and 8 additional genes. Clinical risk assessment by expert clinicians was conducted and compared with biomarker performance in the prediction of premalignant and malignant disease. Methylation status of 9 genes was analyzed in salivary rinses of 191 patients by quantitative methylation-specific PCR.

resultsHOXA9, EDNRB, and deleted in colorectal cancer (DCC) methylation were associated (P = 0.012; P < 0.0001; P = 0.0005) with premalignant or malignant disease. On multivariable modeling, histological diagnosis was only independently associated with EDNRB (P = 0.0003) or DCC (P = 0.004) methylation. A subset of patients received clinical risk classification (CRC) by expert clinicians based on lesion examination. CRC, DCC, and EDNRB were associated with diagnosis of dysplasia/cancer on univariate (P = 0.008; P = 0.026; P = 0.046) and multivariate analysis (P = 0.012; P = 0.037; P = 0.047). CRC identified dysplasia/cancer with 56% of sensitivity and 66% of specificity with a similar area under curve [AUC; 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.60-0.81] when compared to EDNRB and DCC combined AUC (0.60, 95% CI = 0.51-0.69), sensitivity of 46% and specificity of 72%. A combination of EDNRB, DCC, and CRC was optimal AUC (0.67, 95% CI = 0.58-0.76).

conclusionsEDNRB and/or DCC methylation in salivary rinses compares well to examination by an expert clinician in CRC of oral lesions. These salivary biomarkers may be particularly useful in oral premalignancy and malignancy screening in clinical care settings in which expert clinicians are not available.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, DifferentialBiomarkers, TumorDCC ReceptorDNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMouth NeoplasmsNeoplasmsPromoter Regions, GeneticReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, EndothelinSalivaTumor Suppressor ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorDCC protein, humanDCC ReceptorReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, EndothelinTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23637120
PMCPMC3687013
OpenAlexW2158926375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.