Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23636870›Full record

Trial reportJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2013

First experience with a novel robotic remote catheter system: Amigo™ mapping trial.

Ejaz M Khan, William Frumkin, G Andre Ng, Suresh Neelagaru, Freddy M Abi-Samra, Jay Lee, Michael Giudici, Douglas Gohn, Roger A Winkle, Jonathan Sussman and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Portable and Versatile Catheter Robot for Image-Guided Cardiovascular Interventions.IEEE/ASME transactions on mechatronics : a joint publication of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society and the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Current State of Robotics in Interventional Radiology.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ejaz M KhanClinical Research Department, Winchester Medical Center, 1840 Amherst Street, Winchester, VA 22601, USA. ejazkhan@arrhythmiaspecialists.com
William Frumkin
G Andre Ng
Suresh Neelagaru
Freddy M Abi-Samra
Jay Lee
Michael Giudici
Douglas Gohn
Roger A Winkle
Jonathan Sussman
Bradley P Knight
Adam Berman
Hugh Calkins

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAmigo™ (Catheter Robotics, Inc., Mount Olive, NJ) remote catheter system (RCS) was designed to provide a simple and relatively inexpensive system for remote catheter manipulation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance and safety of Amigo in mapping the right side of the heart. METHODS AND

resultsThis non-randomized, prospective clinical trial was conducted at 13 sites (NCT: #01139814). Using the controller, a mapping catheter was moved to eight pre-specified locations in a specific sequence: right ventricular apex, mid-right ventricular septum, right ventricular outflow tract, His-bundle position, coronary sinus ostium, high right atrium, lateral tricuspid annulus, and low lateral right atrium. The pre-specified efficacy endpoint was to achieve 80 % successful navigation to all locations. Time to each location, location accuracy, and quality of contact were confirmed by imaging and specific criteria for electrograms and pacing thresholds. In 181 patients, a total of 1,396 of 1,448 (96 %) locations were successfully mapped with all protocol criteria met (one-sided p value < 0.0001). The median time to move the catheter to a new location was 24 s. The Amigo-related major complication rate was 0 % which was significantly less than the predefined endpoint of 4 % (one-sided p = 0.003).

conclusionWe found the Amigo RCS to be safe and effective for positioning a mapping catheter at sites within the right atrium and ventricle.

Indexed as

Cardiac CathetersArrhythmias, CardiacBody Surface Potential MappingCardiac CatheterizationDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRoboticsSensitivity and SpecificityTelemedicineUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.