Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23636816›Full record

ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2013

Preparation and evaluation of solid dispersions of a new antitumor compound based on early-stage preparation discovery concept.

Peng Hou, Jian Ni, Sali Cao, Haimin Lei, Zhengjun Cai, Tao Zhang, Fang Yu, Qingzhong Tan

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peng HouSchool of Chinese materia medica, Bejing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100102, People's Republic of China.
Jian Ni
Sali Cao
Haimin Lei
Zhengjun Cai
Tao Zhang
Fang Yu
Qingzhong Tan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring sufficient drug solubility is a crucial problem in pharmaceutical-related research. For water-insoluble drugs, various formulation approaches are employed to enhance the solubility and bioavailability of lead compounds. The goal of this study was to enhance the dissolution and absorption of a new antitumor lead compound, T-OA. Early-stage preparation discovery concept was employed in this study. Based on this concept, a solid dispersion system was chosen as the method of improving drug solubility and bioavailability. Solid dispersions of T-OA in polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) K30 were prepared by the solvent evaporation method. Dissolution testing determined that the ideal drug-to-PVP ratio was 1:5. X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry were employed to confirm the formation of solid dispersions. Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated that T-OA was converted into an amorphous form. Both in vitro dissolution testing and the in vivo studies demonstrated that the solubility and bioavailability of T-OA were significantly improved when formulated in a solid dispersion with PVP. The dissolution rate of the T-OA/PVP solid dispersion was greatly enhanced relative to the pure drug, and the relative bioavailability of T-OA solid dispersions was found to be 392.0%, which is 4-fold higher than the pure drug.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAdministration, OralAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBiological AvailabilityCalorimetry, Differential ScanningChemistry, PharmaceuticalDrug CarriersMaleMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningOleanolic AcidPovidonePyrazinesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySolubilityAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicDrug CarriersOleanolic AcidPovidonePyrazines

Identifiers

PMID23636816
PMCPMC3665985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.