Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23636797›Full record

SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2013

CYP2E1 T7632A and 9-bp insertion polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 4,592 cases and 5,918 controls.

Jun Qian, Zhangfa Song, Yinxiang Lv, Xuefeng Huang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Glutathione S-transferase M1 polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk in Chinese population.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. World journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jun QianDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Xinchang People's Hospital, Zhejiang Province, Xinchang, 312500, China.
Zhangfa Song
Yinxiang Lv
Xuefeng Huang
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital · CNXintai People's Hospital · CNZhejiang Medicine (China) · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that genetic factors play important roles in the development of colorectal cancer. CYP2E1 T7632A and 9-bp insertion polymorphisms may influence the risk of colorectal cancer, but published results are conflicting. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis comprising 9 case-control studies with 4,592 cases and 5,918 controls. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) were used to assess the strength of the associations of CYP2E1 T7632A and 9-bp insertion polymorphisms with colorectal cancer. For CYP2E1 T7632A polymorphism, meta-analysis showed that there was no significant association between the CYP2E1 T7632A polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk under all contrast models (A vs. T: OR = 1.06, 95 % CI 0.88-1.29, P = 0.528; AA vs. TT: OR = 0.85, 95 % CI 0.61-1.19, P = 0.351; AA/TA vs. TT: OR = 1.08, 95 % CI 0.87-1.34, P = 0.484; and AA vs. TT/TA: OR = 0.87, 95 % CI 0.62-1.21, P = 0.395). For CYP2E1 96-bp insertion polymorphism, meta-analysis showed that there was a significant association between the CYP2E1 96-bp insertion polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk under the allele contrast model and the dominant contrast model (for the allele contrast model: OR = 1.20, 95 % CI 1.06-1.36, P = 0.005; for the dominant contrast model: OR = 1.25, 95 % CI 1.07-1.45, P = 0.005). Subgroup analysis by race suggested that there was an obvious association between the CYP2E1 96-bp insertion polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk in Asians under the codominant contrast model. In conclusion, our meta-analysis demonstrates that there is a significant association between the CYP2E1 96-bp insertion polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk, and CYP2E1 9-bp insertion polymorphism is a risk factor for developing colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsCytochrome P-450 CYP2E1Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMutagenesis, InsertionalPolymorphism, GeneticRiskCytochrome P-450 CYP2E1

Identifiers

PMID23636797
OpenAlexW1974970427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.