Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23636723›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2013

Sucking and swallowing rates after palatal anesthesia: an electromyographic study in infant pigs.

Shaina Devi Holman, Danielle R Waranch, Regina Campbell-Malone, Peng Ding, Estela M Gierbolini-Norat, Stacey L Lukasik, Rebecca Z German

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The effects of simulated gastroesophageal reflux on infant pig oropharyngeal feeding physiology.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Nipple properties affect sensorimotor integration during bottle feeding in an infant pig model.Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shaina Devi HolmanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. swahl001@umaryland.edu
Danielle R Waranch
Regina Campbell-Malone
Peng Ding
Estela M Gierbolini-Norat
Stacey L Lukasik
Rebecca Z German
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

TRAINING IN OROFACIAL BIOLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCET32DE007309 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI GORDON, SHARON M. · 1997 to 2012
$6.8M
Research Training in Rehabilitation for Brain Injury and Neurological DisabilityT32HD007414 · NICHD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI Amy J. Bastian · 1991 to 2026
$6.3M
DIFFERENCES IN SWALLOW MECHANICS IN INFANTSR01DC003604 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI GERMAN, REBECCA Z · 1998 to 2005
$1.8M
Oral Sensation During Pharyngeal Swallowing in Infant MammalsF30DE021944 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI HOLMAN, SHAINA DEVI · 2012 to 2015
$111k
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD-007414NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC-03604NIDCR NIH HHS F30 DE-021944NIDCR NIH HHS F30 DE021944NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE-07309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infant mammalian feeding consists of rhythmic suck cycles and reflexive pharyngeal swallows. Although we know how oropharyngeal sensation influences the initiation and frequency of suck and swallow cycles, the role of palatal sensation is unknown. We implanted EMG electrodes into the mylohyoid muscle, a muscle active during suckling, and the thyrohyoid muscle, a muscle active during swallowing, in eight infant pigs. Pigs were then bottle-fed while lateral videofluoroscopy was simultaneously recorded from the electrodes. Two treatments were administered prior to feeding and compared with control feedings: 1) palatal anesthesia (0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride), and 2) palatal saline. Using the timing of mylohyoid muscle and thyrohyoid muscle activity, we tested for differences between treatment and control feedings for swallowing frequency and suck cycle duration. Following palatal anesthesia, four pigs could not suck and exhibited excessive jaw movement. We categorized the four pigs that could suck after palatal anesthesia as group A, and those who could not as group B. Group A had no significant change in suck cycle duration and a higher swallowing frequency after palatal saline (P = 0.021). Group B had significantly longer suck cycles after palatal anesthesia (P < 0.001) and a slower swallowing frequency (P < 0.001). Swallowing frequency may be a way to predict group membership, since it was different in control feedings between groups (P < 0.001). The qualitative and bimodal group response to palatal anesthesia may reflect a developmental difference. This study demonstrates that palatal sensation is involved in the initiation and frequency of suck and swallow cycles in infant feeding.

Indexed as

AnimalsDeglutitionElectromyographyMaxillary NerveNerve BlockPalateSucking BehaviorSwinebupivacaineelectromyographypalatesuckingswallowing

Identifiers

PMID23636723
PMCPMC3727070
OpenAlexW1975360515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.