Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23636722›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2013

Inhibitory inputs tune the light response properties of dopaminergic amacrine cells in mouse retina.

G S Newkirk, M Hoon, R O Wong, P B Detwiler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Interaction Between Near Work and Narrowband Light on Choroidal Thickness.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Role of GJD2(Cx36) in Refractive Error Development.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Circadian regulation in the retina: From molecules to network.The European journal of neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G S NewkirkDepartment of Physiology & Biophysics and Program in Neurobiology & Behavior, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
M Hoon
R O Wong
P B Detwiler
University of Washington · US

Funding

Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JAMES Bryant HURLEY · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
INTERCELLULAR COMMUNICATION IN RETINAL DEVELOPMENTR01EY010699 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WONG, RACHEL O · 1994 to 2024
$8.6M
RETINAL PHOTORECEPTORS &SECOND ORDER CELLSR01EY002048 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DETWILER, PETER BENTON · 1985 to 2011
$2.7M
NEI NIH HHS EY02048NEI NIH HHS EY07031NEI NIH HHS EY10699NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dopamine (DA) is a neuromodulator that in the retina adjusts the circuitry for visual processing in dim and bright light conditions. It is synthesized and released from retinal interneurons called dopaminergic amacrine cells (DACs), whose basic physiology is not yet been fully characterized. To investigate their cellular and input properties as well as light responses, DACs were targeted for whole cell recording in isolated retina using two-photon fluorescence microscopy in a mouse line where the dopamine receptor 2 promoter drives green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression. Differences in membrane properties gave rise to cell-to-cell variation in the pattern of resting spontaneous spike activity ranging from silent to rhythmic to periodic burst discharge. All recorded DACs were light sensitive and generated responses that varied with intensity. The threshold response to light onset was a hyperpolarizing potential change initiated by rod photoreceptors that was blocked by strychnine, indicating a glycinergic amacrine input onto DACs at light onset. With increasing light intensity, the ON response acquired an excitatory component that grew to dominate the response to the strongest stimuli. Responses to bright light (photopic) stimuli also included an inhibitory OFF response mediated by GABAergic amacrine cells driven by the cone OFF pathway. DACs expressed GABA (GABA(A)α1 and GABA(A)α3) and glycine (α2) receptor clusters on soma, axon, and dendrites consistent with the light response being shaped by dual inhibitory inputs that may serve to tune spike discharge for optimal DA release.

Indexed as

Amacrine CellsAnimalsDopaminergic NeuronsGABAergic NeuronsIn Vitro TechniquesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicPhotic StimulationSynaptic Potentialsamacrine celldopaminergic neuronelectrophysiologyimmunocytochemistryretina

Identifiers

PMID23636722
PMCPMC3727066
OpenAlexW2008135767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.