Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23636536›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2013

Craniosynostosis: imaging review and primer on computed tomography.

Chaitra A Badve, Mallikarjunappa M K, Ramesh S Iyer, Gisele E Ishak, Paritosh C Khanna

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Imaging diagnosis of ventriculomegaly: fetal, neonatal, and pediatric.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Imaging in craniosynostosis: when and what?Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Craniofacial Tissue Engineering.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chaitra A BadveDepartment of Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA. chaitrabadve@gmail.com
Mallikarjunappa M K
Ramesh S Iyer
Gisele E Ishak
Paritosh C Khanna
Seattle Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Craniosynostosis is encountered in the pediatric population in isolated or syndromic forms. The resulting deformity depends on the number and type of sutures involved and, in multi-sutural synostosis, the order of suture fusion. Primary craniosynostosis needs to be differentiated from the secondary variety and positional or deformational mimics. Syndromic craniosynostoses are associated with other craniofacial deformities. Evaluation with 3-D CT plays an important role in accurate diagnosis and management; however, implementation of appropriate CT techniques is essential to limit the radiation burden in these children. In this article, the authors briefly review the classification, embryopathogenesis and epidemiology and describe in detail the radiologic appearance and differential diagnoses of craniosynostosis.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolCraniosynostosesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalInfantInfant, NewbornRadiographic Image EnhancementSkullTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID23636536
OpenAlexW1993471764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.