Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23636129›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2013

Topographically-patterned porous membranes in a microfluidic device as an in vitro model of renal reabsorptive barriers.

Else M Frohlich, José Luis Alonso, Jeffrey T Borenstein, Xin Zhang, M Amin Arnaout, Joseph L Charest

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in medical technology · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Role for 3D Printing in Kidney-on-a-Chip Platforms.Current transplantation reports · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Tissue-engineered kidney disease models.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Else M FrohlichBoston University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
José Luis Alonso
Jeffrey T Borenstein
Xin Zhang
M Amin Arnaout
Joseph L Charest
Draper Laboratory · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USBoston University · US

Funding

Structure and Function of beta2 IntegrinR01DK048549 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ARNAOUT, M. AMIN · 1994 to 2016
$6.0M
Structure and Function of Integrins in the KidneyR01DK088327 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ARNAOUT, M. AMIN · 2010 to 2025
$5.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK048549NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK088327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Models of reabsorptive barriers require both a means to provide realistic physiologic cues to and quantify transport across a layer of cells forming the barrier. Here we have topographically-patterned porous membranes with several user-defined pattern types. To demonstrate the utility of the patterned membranes, we selected one type of pattern and applied it to a membrane to serve as a cell culture support in a microfluidic model of a renal reabsorptive barrier. The topographic cues in the model resemble physiological cues found in vivo while the porous structure allows quantification of transport across the cell layer. Sub-micron surface topography generated via hot-embossing onto a track-etched polycarbonate membrane, fully replicated topographical features and preserved porous architecture. Pore size and shape were analyzed with SEM and image analysis to determine the effect of hot embossing on pore morphology. The membrane was assembled into a bilayer microfluidic device and a human kidney proximal tubule epithelial cell line (HK-2) and primary renal proximal tubule epithelial cells (RPTEC) were cultured to confluency on the membrane. Immunofluorescent staining of both cell types revealed protein expression indicative of the formation of a reabsorptive barrier responsive to mechanical stimulation: ZO-1 (tight junction), paxillin (focal adhesions) and acetylated α-tubulin (primary cilia). HK-2 and RPTEC aligned in the direction of ridge/groove topography of the membrane in the device, evidence that the device has mechanical control over cell response. This topographically-patterned porous membrane provides an in vitro platform on which to model reabsorptive barriers with meaningful applications for understanding biological transport phenomenon, underlying disease mechanisms, and drug toxicity.

Indexed as

Membranes, ArtificialCells, CulturedEpithelial CellsHumansKidney Tubules, ProximalMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesModels, BiologicalPaxillinPorosityTubulinZonula Occludens-1 ProteinMembranes, ArtificialPaxillinTubulinZonula Occludens-1 Protein

Identifiers

PMID23636129
PMCPMC4578304
OpenAlexW2056392875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.