ArticleLab on a chip2013
Topographically-patterned porous membranes in a microfluidic device as an in vitro model of renal reabsorptive barriers.
Article in Lab on a chip, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction, evaluation, and applications of renal barrier-on-a-chip system.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Ultra-thin and ultra-porous nanofiber networks as a basement-membrane mimic.Lab on a chip · 2023Article
- Application of microfluidic chips in the simulation of the urinary system microenvironment.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- A high-throughput, 28-day, microfluidic model of gingival tissue inflammation and recovery.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Potential Applications of Microfluidics to Acute Kidney Injury Associated with Viral Infection.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2020Article
- Review
- Topographic Guidance in Melt-Electrowritten Tubular Scaffolds Enhances Engineered Kidney Tubule Performance.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Nanoridge patterns on polymeric film by a photodegradation copying method for metallic nanowire networks.RSC advances · 2018Article
- Screening of Drug-Transporter Interactions in a 3D Microfluidic Renal Proximal Tubule on a Chip.The AAPS journal · 2018Article
- Effect of flow on targeting and penetration of angiopep-decorated nanoparticles in a microfluidic model blood-brain barrier.PloS one · 2018Article
- Drug absorption related nephrotoxicity assessment on an intestine-kidney chip.Biomicrofluidics · 2017Article
- Article
- A Role for 3D Printing in Kidney-on-a-Chip Platforms.Current transplantation reports · 2016Article
- A Reversibly Sealed, Easy Access, Modular (SEAM) Microfluidic Architecture to Establish In Vitro Tissue Interfaces.PloS one · 2016Article
- Synergistic effects of matrix nanotopography and stiffness on vascular smooth muscle cell function.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2014Article
- Review
- Approaches to in vitro tissue regeneration with application for human disease modeling and drug development.Drug discovery today · 2014Review
- Tissue-engineered kidney disease models.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Models of reabsorptive barriers require both a means to provide realistic physiologic cues to and quantify transport across a layer of cells forming the barrier. Here we have topographically-patterned porous membranes with several user-defined pattern types. To demonstrate the utility of the patterned membranes, we selected one type of pattern and applied it to a membrane to serve as a cell culture support in a microfluidic model of a renal reabsorptive barrier. The topographic cues in the model resemble physiological cues found in vivo while the porous structure allows quantification of transport across the cell layer. Sub-micron surface topography generated via hot-embossing onto a track-etched polycarbonate membrane, fully replicated topographical features and preserved porous architecture. Pore size and shape were analyzed with SEM and image analysis to determine the effect of hot embossing on pore morphology. The membrane was assembled into a bilayer microfluidic device and a human kidney proximal tubule epithelial cell line (HK-2) and primary renal proximal tubule epithelial cells (RPTEC) were cultured to confluency on the membrane. Immunofluorescent staining of both cell types revealed protein expression indicative of the formation of a reabsorptive barrier responsive to mechanical stimulation: ZO-1 (tight junction), paxillin (focal adhesions) and acetylated α-tubulin (primary cilia). HK-2 and RPTEC aligned in the direction of ridge/groove topography of the membrane in the device, evidence that the device has mechanical control over cell response. This topographically-patterned porous membrane provides an in vitro platform on which to model reabsorptive barriers with meaningful applications for understanding biological transport phenomenon, underlying disease mechanisms, and drug toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.