Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23636098›Full record

Trial reportJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2013

A randomized trial of platelet transfusions over 30 vs 120 minutes: is there an effect on post-transfusion platelet counts?

D C Dannaway, S Noori

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D C DannawaySection on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA. douglas-dannaway@ouhsc.edu
S Noori

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether platelet infusion time affects platelet counts in thrombocytopenic newborns. STUDY

designThis was a prospective randomized control study of 43 platelet transfusions given to newborns. Transfusions were randomized to run over either 30 min or 2 h. Platelet counts taken 30 min and 6 h after transfusion were compared using parametric, nonparametric, Pearson's correlation and logistic regression.

resultChanges in platelet counts 30 min and 6 h after transfusion were not different between the groups. Weak but significant negative correlations existed between postmenstrual age and change in platelet count at 30 min (r=-0.33, P=0.04) and 6 h (r=-0.37, P=0.018) after transfusion. There were no differences between the mean blood pressures before and after transfusion in either group.

conclusionTransfusion duration does not affect post-transfusion platelet counts in newborns. Babies of lower postmenstrual age (PMA) may have better responses to platelet transfusions. Finally, platelet transfusions over both durations are well tolerated in neonates.

Indexed as

Intensive Care, NeonatalPlatelet TransfusionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePlatelet CountProspective StudiesThrombocytopeniaTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23636098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.