Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23635786›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2013

Sox9 and programming of liver and pancreatic progenitors.

Yoshiya Kawaguchi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dynamic activation and dual roles of SOX9Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Significance of CCNs in liver regeneration.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Improvement of Lipotoxicity-Induced IsletJournal of diabetes research · 2022
    Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoshiya KawaguchiDepartment of Clinical Application, Center for iPS cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. yoshiyak@cira.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Kyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in developmental biology have greatly expanded our understanding of progenitor cell programming and the fundamental roles that Sox9 plays in liver and pancreas organogenesis. In the last 2 years, several studies have dissected the behavior of the Sox9+ duct cells in adult organs, but conflicting results have left unanswered the long-standing question of whether physiologically functioning progenitors exist in adult liver and pancreas. On the other hand, increasing evidence suggests that duct cells function as progenitors in the tissue restoration process after injury, during which embryonic programs are sometimes reactivated. This article discusses the role of Sox9 in programming liver and pancreatic progenitors as well as controversies in the field.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAllelesAnimalsCell LineageDevelopmental BiologyHumansIntegrasesLiverLiver RegenerationMicePancreasSOX9 Transcription FactorStem CellsCre recombinaseIntegrasesSOX9 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID23635786
PMCPMC3635727
OpenAlexW2168190340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.