Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23635784›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2013

Differentiation of progenitors in the liver: a matter of local choice.

Luke Boulter, Wei-Yu Lu, Stuart J Forbes

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Update on Hepatobiliary Plasticity.Seminars in liver disease · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. ADAM-Mediated Signalling Pathways in Gastrointestinal Cancer Formation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luke BoulterMedical Research Council Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Wei-Yu Lu
Stuart J Forbes
Medical Research Council · GBMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UKMedical Research Council G1000868Medical Research Council MR/K017047/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The liver is a complex organ that requires multiple rounds of cell fate decision for development and homeostasis throughout the lifetime. During the earliest phases of organogenesis, the liver acquires a separate lineage from the pancreas and the intestine, and subsequently, the liver bud must appropriately differentiate to form metabolic hepatocytes and cholangiocytes for proper hepatic physiology. In addition, throughout life, the liver is bombarded with chemical and pathological insults, which require the activation and correct differentiation of adult progenitor cells. This Review seeks to provide an overview of the complex signaling relationships that allow these tightly regulated processes to occur.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleCell DifferentiationCell LineageHepatectomyHumansInflammationLigandsLiverLiver NeoplasmsLiver TransplantationLiving DonorsMiceMitosisNeoplasmsRatsLigands

Identifiers

PMID23635784
PMCPMC3635730
OpenAlexW2095876709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.