Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23635737›Full record

Trial reportObstetrics and gynecology2013

Patient satisfaction after midurethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence.

Clifford Y Wai, Teresa M Curto, Halina M Zyczynski, Anne M Stoddard, Kathryn L Burgio, Linda Brubaker, Leslie M Rickey, Shawn A Menefee, Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network*

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00325039 (TOMUS-Trial Of Mid-Urethral Slings), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00325039 phase4completednot on this map

TOMUS-Trial Of Mid-Urethral Slings

TypeinterventionalSponsorCarelon ResearchRan2006 to 2013Enrolled597ConditionsUrinary IncontinenceArmsretropubic mid-urethral sling (TVT), transobturator mid-urethral sling (TVT-O and the Monarc)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Clifford Y WaiUniversity of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas; the New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts; the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Veterans Affairs and The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; the University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; and the University of California, San Diego, California.
Teresa M Curto
Halina M Zyczynski
Anne M Stoddard
Kathryn L Burgio
Linda Brubaker
Leslie M Rickey
Shawn A Menefee
Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network*

Funding

Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network: DCCU01DK058229 · NIDDK · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI TENNSTEDT, SHARON L · 2000 to 2012
$16.1M
UAB Continence Treatment Center U01DK060380 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI RICHTER, HOLLY E · 2001 to 2009
$3.9M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK058225 · NIDDK · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ZYCZYNSKI, HALINA M · 2000 to 2009
$3.8M
UCSD INCONTINENCE TREATMENT CENTERU01DK060401 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ALBO, MICHAEL · 2001 to 2010
$3.6M
Continuation of the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN)U01DK060379 · NIDDK · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI BRUBAKER, LINDA · 2001 to 2009
$3.6M
UTAH URINARY INCONTINENCE TREATMENT NETWORK (UUITN)U01DK060393 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NORTON, PEGGY A · 2001 to 2009
$3.4M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK058231 · NIDDK · WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL RESEARCH INST · PI SIRLS, LARRY T · 2000 to 2009
$3.3M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN)U01DK060397 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CHAI, TOBY C · 2001 to 2010
$2.7M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK060395 · NIDDK · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZIMMERN, PHILIPPE E · 2001 to 2009
$2.4M
The Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK058234 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI KRAUS, STEPHEN R · 2000 to 2009
$2.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058225NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058229NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058231NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058234NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060379NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060380NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060393NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060395NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060397NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060401NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK58225,NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK58229NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK58231NIDDK NIH HHS U01DK58234NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60379NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60380NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60393NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60395NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60397NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify factors that may contribute to patient satisfaction with outcome in women who received retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings.

methodsSatisfaction was assessed 12 months postsurgery as a planned analysis in 597 participants from a multicenter randomized trial comparing retropubic with transobturator midurethral slings using the Incontinence Surgery Satisfaction Questionnaire. Significantly related variables associated with satisfaction in univariable analyses were entered into multivariable logistic regression models to test their independent association with satisfaction.

resultsOne year after surgery, 264 (88.6%) in the retropubic group and 263 (88.0%) in the transobturator group completed satisfaction questionnaires. Both treatment groups demonstrated a high level of satisfaction with respect to urine leakage (retropubic 85.9% compared with transobturator 90.0%; P=.52), urgency to urinate, frequency of urination, capability of physical activity, social activity, ability to engage in sexual activity, and from an emotional standpoint. Baseline characteristics associated with reduced satisfaction were higher Medical, Epidemiologic, and Social Aspects of Aging Questionnaire urgency subscale scores, detrusor overactivity, and diabetes mellitus. The severity of both objective (frequency of incontinence episodes, pad test weight) and subjective (Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and Urogenital Distress Inventory score) measures of incontinence at baseline and the patients' perceptions of preoperative severity of incontinence and expectations of achieving postoperative cure or improvement were not statistically different between satisfied and unsatisfied patients. In the final multivariable model, satisfaction was associated with overall treatment success (odds ratio [OR] 2.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-5.13], greater reduction in Urogenital Distress Inventory (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.98) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire scores (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99), and fewer complications (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.30-0.99).

conclusionThe high level of satisfaction seen after midurethral sling procedures is associated with greater objective and patient-perceived improvement of stress incontinence and fewer complications. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00325039. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionSuburethral SlingsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedUrinary Incontinence, Stress

Identifiers

PMID23635737
PMCPMC4048751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.