Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23635248›Full record

ReviewMedical physics2013

Nuclear imaging of the breast: translating achievements in instrumentation into clinical use.

Carrie B Hruska, Michael K O'Connor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical physics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Current and future perspectives of molecular breast imaging with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Review
  3. Current Concepts in Molecular Breast Imaging.Journal of breast imaging · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Application-specific nuclear medicalPhysics in medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Methodological aspects ofClinical and translational imaging · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Non-rigid registration of serial dedicated breast CT, longitudinal dedicated breast CT and PET/CT images using the diffeomorphic demons method.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carrie B HruskaDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Michael K O'Connor

Funding

Dual Headed CZT Breast ImagerR42CA128407 · NCI · GAMMA MEDICA-IDEAS, INC. · PI WAGENAAR, DOUGLAS J. · 2007 to 2009
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA 128407NCI NIH HHS R42 CA128407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approaches to imaging the breast with nuclear medicine and∕or molecular imaging methods have been under investigation since the late 1980s when a technique called scintimammography was first introduced. This review charts the progress of nuclear imaging of the breast over the last 20 years, covering the development of newer techniques such as breast specific gamma imaging, molecular breast imaging, and positron emission mammography. Key issues critical to the adoption of these technologies in the clinical environment are discussed, including the current status of clinical studies, the efforts at reducing the radiation dose from procedures associated with these technologies, and the relevant radiopharmaceuticals that are available or under development. The necessary steps required to move these technologies from bench to bedside are also discussed.

Indexed as

BreastTranslational Research, BiomedicalBreast NeoplasmsHumansMolecular ImagingNuclear Medicine

Identifiers

PMID23635248
PMCPMC3656956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.