GuidelineArchives of pathology & laboratory medicine2013
Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.
Guideline in Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 271 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
271 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 593 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital pathology in forensic science: a systematic review of the literature.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Pooled it
- Guidelines for the adoption of digital pathology in clinical pathology units recommended by the polish society of pathologists.Diagnostic pathology · 2026Guideline
- Relevance of the College of American Pathologists guideline for validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes to cytopathology.Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology · 2023Pooled it
- Technical and Diagnostic Issues in Whole Slide Imaging Published Validation Studies.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Best Practice Recommendations for the Implementation of a Digital Pathology Workflow in the Anatomic Pathology Laboratory by the European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Guideline
- Diagnostic concordance and discordance in digital pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical pathology · 2021Pooled it
- The use of digital microscopy as a teaching method for human pathology: a systematic review.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2020Pooled it
- The performance of digital microscopy for primary diagnosis in human pathology: a systematic review.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2019Pooled it
- ["Digital Pathology in Diagnostics-reporting on digital images" guideline of the Professional Association of German Pathologists].Der Pathologe · 2018Guideline
- Whole Slide Imaging Versus Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology: A Multicenter Blinded Randomized Noninferiority Study of 1992 Cases (Pivotal Study).The American journal of surgical pathology · 2018Trial
- Whole-slide imaging in hematopathology: Current state, challenges and future opportunities.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- Applicability of handheld laser scanning for nonmetric skeletal assessment in biological profile estimation: a preliminary two-case study.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Digital Pathology in Dermatology - Current Status, Applications and Perspectives.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026Review
- An integrated AI pipeline for automated cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow karyograms in hematological malignancies: A Pix2Pix enhancement and deep learning detection approach.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Benchmarking Open-Source Pathology Foundation Models for Breast Cancer Biomarker Prediction from H&E Whole-Slide Images.Cancers · 2026Article
- Autopsy Pathology's Paradigm Shift: Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies in the Era of Digitally Integrated Death Investigation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Digital diagnostic pathology between promise and professional erosion: artificial intelligence and the future of diagnostic sovereignty.Journal of clinical pathology · 2026Article
- Telepathology Development and Stakeholder Perspectives in China: Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- AI caption generation model for digital pathology of adenocarcinoma in endoscopic histopathology using multi-instance attention mechanisms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Robust Cell-Level Classification for Liquid-Based Cervical Cytology Using Deep Transfer Learning: A Multi-Source Study Addressing Scanner-Induced Domain Shifts.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
211 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
contextThere is increasing interest in using whole slide imaging (WSI) for diagnostic purposes (primary and/or consultation). An important consideration is whether WSI can safely replace conventional light microscopy as the method by which pathologists review histologic sections, cytology slides, and/or hematology slides to render diagnoses. Validation of WSI is crucial to ensure that diagnostic performance based on digitized slides is at least equivalent to that of glass slides and light microscopy. Currently, there are no standard guidelines regarding validation of WSI for diagnostic use.
objectiveTo recommend validation requirements for WSI systems to be used for diagnostic purposes.
designThe College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center convened a nonvendor panel from North America with expertise in digital pathology to develop these validation recommendations. A literature review was performed in which 767 international publications that met search term requirements were identified. Studies outside the scope of this effort and those related solely to technical elements, education, and image analysis were excluded. A total of 27 publications were graded and underwent data extraction for evidence evaluation. Recommendations were derived from the strength of evidence determined from 23 of these published studies, open comment feedback, and expert panel consensus.
resultsTwelve guideline statements were established to help pathology laboratories validate their own WSI systems intended for clinical use. Validation of the entire WSI system, involving pathologists trained to use the system, should be performed in a manner that emulates the laboratory's actual clinical environment. It is recommended that such a validation study include at least 60 routine cases per application, comparing intraobserver diagnostic concordance between digitized and glass slides viewed at least 2 weeks apart. It is important that the validation process confirm that all material present on a glass slide to be scanned is included in the digital image.
conclusionsValidation should demonstrate that the WSI system under review produces acceptable digital slides for diagnostic interpretation. The intention of validating WSI systems is to permit the clinical use of this technology in a manner that does not compromise patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.