ArticleExpert review of clinical immunology2013
Targeting IL-15 in large granular lymphocyte leukemia.
Article in Expert review of clinical immunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inclusion Body Myositis and Neoplasia: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia: From Immunopathogenesis to Treatment of Refractory Disease.Cancers · 2021Review
- Active immunization with human interleukin-15 induces neutralizing antibodies in non-human primates.BMC immunology · 2016Article
- The pathogenesis and treatment of large granular lymphocyte leukemia.Blood reviews · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
IL-15 is a cytokine that stimulates the proliferation of NK and T cells. Previous studies have shown that IL-15 is critical to the induction of T-cell large granular lymphocyte (T-LGL) leukemia. A Phase I trial of a humanized antibody (Hu-Mikβ1) to the IL2/IL15Rβ receptor, expressed on T-LGL, is explored in this trial to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, specificity and clinical efficacy of Hu-Mikβ1. The study demonstrated no toxicity and favorable saturation of IL2/IL15Rβ receptor, but no clinical efficacy in this Phase I study.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.