Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23634367›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2012

Diagnosis and treatment of rapidly progressive dementias.

Ross W Paterson, Leonel T Takada, Michael D Geschwind

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Inflammatory Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: A Broad Clinical Spectrum.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2023
    Review
  5. Neuroinflammation: A Potential Risk for Dementia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prion Diseases.Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.) · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Neurocognitive features distinguishing primary central nervous system lymphoma from other possible causes of rapidly progressive dementia.Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ross W PatersonUniversity of California (RWP, LTT, MDG), San Francisco Memory and Aging Center, San Francisco; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (RWP), Queen Square, London, UK; and Department of Neurology (LTT), University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Leonel T Takada
Michael D Geschwind

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapidly progressive dementias are conditions that typically cause dementia over weeks or months. They are a particular challenge to neurologists as the differential diagnosis often is different from the more typical, slowly progressive dementias. Early and accurate diagnosis is essential, as many of the etiologies are treatable. The information in this review is in part based on experience through our rapidly progressive dementia program at the University of California San Francisco, Memory and Aging Center. As treatment of a rapidly progressive dementia is entirely dependent on the diagnosis, we present a comprehensive, structured, but pragmatic approach to diagnosis, including key clinical, laboratory, and radiologic features. For the 2 most common causes of rapid dementia, treatment algorithms for the autoimmune encephalopathies and symptomatic management for the neurodegenerative causes are discussed.

Identifiers

PMID23634367
PMCPMC3613204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.