Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23633916›Full record

ArticleCurrent genomics2012

Genetic association studies: an information content perspective.

Cen Wu, Shaoyu Li, Yuehua Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A trans-omics gene-smoking interaction study of lung cancer based on consortium data.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gene-Environment Interaction: A Variable Selection Perspective.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Epistatic effects of multiple receptor genes on pathophysiology of asthma - its limits and potential for clinical application.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cen WuDepartment of Statistics and Probability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Shaoyu Li
Yuehua Cui

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of high-density single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) data has made the human genetic association studies possible to identify common and rare variants underlying complex diseases in a genome-wide scale. A handful of novel genetic variants have been identified, which gives much hope and prospects for the future of genetic association studies. In this process, statistical and computational methods play key roles, among which information-based association tests have gained large popularity. This paper is intended to give a comprehensive review of the current literature in genetic association analysis casted in the framework of information theory. We focus our review on the following topics: (1) information theoretic approaches in genetic linkage and association studies; (2) entropy-based strategies for optimal SNP subset selection; and (3) the usage of theoretic information criteria in gene clustering and gene regulatory network construction.

Indexed as

Conditional entropyEntropyEpistasisGene-centric analysisHaplotype analysisMutual informationSingle nucleotide polymorphism.Synergistic effect

Identifiers

PMID23633916
PMCPMC3468889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.