ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography2013
The role of structural bioinformatics resources in the era of integrative structural biology.
Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- PDBe-SIFTS: An open-source tool for Structure Integration with Function, Taxonomy, and Sequences, featuring improved alignment, scoring scheme, and accelerated search.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- PDBe-SIFTS: an open-source tool for Structure Integration with Function, Taxonomy, and Sequences, featuring improved alignment, scoring scheme, and accelerated search.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Reporting on the future of integrative structural biology ORAU workshop.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2020Article
- ETDB-Caltech: A blockchain-based distributed public database for electron tomography.PloS one · 2019Article
- Raw diffraction data preservation and reuse: overview, update on practicalities and metadata requirements.IUCrJ · 2017Review
- Web-based volume slicer for 3D electron-microscopy data from EMDB.Journal of structural biology · 2016Article
- A 3D cellular context for the macromolecular world.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2014Article
- How to make deposition of images a reality.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography · 2014Article
- MotiveValidator: interactive web-based validation of ligand and residue structure in biomolecular complexes.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- PDBe: Protein Data Bank in Europe.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- The European Bioinformatics Institute's data resources 2014.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- How community has shaped the Protein Data Bank.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2013Article
- Towards a structural biology work bench.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The history and the current state of the PDB and EMDB archives is briefly described, as well as some of the challenges that they face. It seems natural that the role of structural biology archives will change from being a pure repository of historic data into becoming an indispensable resource for the wider biomedical community. As part of this transformation, it will be necessary to validate the biomacromolecular structure data and ensure the highest possible quality for the archive holdings, to combine structural data from different spatial scales into a unified resource and to integrate structural data with functional, genetic and taxonomic data as well as other information available in bioinformatics resources. Some recent developments and plans to address these challenges at PDBe are presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.