Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23633392›Full record

ArticleCancer2013

Phase 1/1b study of lonafarnib and temozolomide in patients with recurrent or temozolomide refractory glioblastoma.

Shlomit Yust-Katz, Diane Liu, Ying Yuan, Vivien Liu, Sanghee Kang, Morris Groves, Vinay Puduvalli, Victor Levin, Charles Conrad, Howard Colman and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Autophagy as a Potential Therapy for Malignant Glioma.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Recurrent malignant gliomas.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shlomit Yust-KatzDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Diane Liu
Ying Yuan
Vivien Liu
Sanghee Kang
Morris Groves
Vinay Puduvalli
Victor Levin
Charles Conrad
Howard Colman
Sigmonid Hsu
W K Alfred Yung
Mark R Gilbert
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USSequoia Hospital · USHuntsman Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Patient Oriented Research Program in Neuro-oncologyK24CA160777 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI PUDUVALLI, VINAY K · 2012 to 2015
$580k
NCI NIH HHS K24 CA160777NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLonafarnib is an oral selective farnesyltransferase inhibitor, a class of drugs which have shown activity in preclinical glioma models. Temozolomide (TMZ) is an alkylating agent that is the first-line chemotherapy for glioblastoma.

methodsThe current study combined the cytotoxic agent TMZ with the cytostatic agent lonafarnib for patients with recurrent glioblastoma to establish a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination and its preliminary efficacy. Three dose cohorts of lonafarnib were studied in the phase 1 component of the trial (100 mg twice daily [bid], 150 mg bid, and 200 bid) with dose-dense schedule of TMZ (150 mg/m² daily) administered in an alternating weekly schedule. After establishing the MTD of lonafarnib, a subsequent expansion phase 1b was undertaken to evaluate efficacy, primarily measured by 6-month progression-free survival (PFS-6).

resultsFifteen patients were enrolled into the phase 1 component and 20 patients into the phase 1b component. The MTD of lonafarnib in combination with TMZ was 200 mg bid. Among the patients enrolled into the study, 34 were eligible for 6-month progression evaluation and 35 patients were evaluable for time-to-progression analysis. The PFS-6 rate was 38% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 22%, 56%) and the median PFS was 3.9 months (95% CI = 2.5, 8.4). The median disease-specific survival was 13.7 months (95% CI = 8.9, 22.1). Hematologic toxicities, particularly lymphopenia, were the most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events. There were no treatment-related deaths.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate that TMZ can be safely combined with a farnesyltransferase inhibitor and that this regimen is active, although the current study cannot determine the relative contributions of the 2 agents or the contribution of the novel administration schedule.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDacarbazineDibenzocycloheptenesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGlioblastomaHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPiperidinesPyridinesSupratentorial NeoplasmsTemozolomideDacarbazineDibenzocyclohepteneslonafarnibPiperidinesPyridinesTemozolomidefarnesyltransferase inhibitorglioblastomalonafarnibrecurrenttemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID23633392
PMCPMC4001735
OpenAlexW1639328427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.