Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23633089›Full record

ArticleInfection2013

Bacterial infection in elderly nursing home and community-based patients: a prospective cohort study.

J Videcnik Zorman, L Lusa, F Strle, V Maraspin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J Videcnik ZormanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Japljeva 2, 1525, Ljubljana, Slovenia, jerneja.videcnik@gmail.com.
L Lusa
F Strle
V Maraspin
Ljubljana University Medical Centre · SIUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the study was to assess differences between elderly nursing home (NH) residents and elderly patients living in the community admitted to hospital for bacterial infection.

methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study with manual data collection. Patients aged 65 years and older from NHs and from the community admitted to hospital for bacterial infection were included in the study. Patient characteristics, site of infection, microorganism profile, and final outcome were assessed and compared between these two subgroups of patients.

resultsTwo hundred and sixty-two patients were from NHs and 707 were from the community. Patients from NHs were older, had more underlying chronic illnesses, and more often showed characteristics indicating advanced debility. In both groups, the most common site of infection was the respiratory tract. In comparison to the community group, patients from NHs had a higher fatality rate (23.3 vs. 10.9%) and more often experienced functional decline at discharge (27.5 vs. 16.8%). After adjustment for age, sex, presence of comorbidity, and debility, NH residence remained associated with increased in-hospital mortality but not with functional decline.

conclusionsElderly patients from NHs admitted to hospital for bacterial infection are older and more debilitated than their counterparts from the community. Microorganisms found in the NH residents are somewhat different from those in the community dwellers. The community dwellers had a better survival rate than those admitted from the NHs after adjusting for age, sex, presence of any comorbidity, and debility.

Indexed as

Homes for the AgedAgedAged, 80 and overBacteriaBacterial InfectionsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsComorbidityFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleProspective StudiesResidence CharacteristicsSlovenia

Identifiers

PMID23633089
OpenAlexW1974634757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.