Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23632625›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2013

Estimation and selection of complex covariate effects in pooled nested case-control studies with heterogeneity.

Mengling Liu, Wenbin Lu, Vittorio Krogh, Göran Hallmans, Tess V Clendenen, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mengling LiuDepartments of Population Health and Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Wenbin Lu
Vittorio Krogh
Göran Hallmans
Tess V Clendenen
Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte
New York University · USNorth Carolina State University · USUmeå University · SE

Funding

Flexible Statistical Methods for Complex Survival Data in Biomedical StudiesR01CA140632 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI LU, WENBIN · 2010 to 2013
$795k
Integration and Evaluation of Pooled Cancer Studies with HeterogeneityR21CA169739 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LIU, MENGLING · 2013 to 2014
$408k
Inflammatory Markers in Circulation and Ovarian Cancer RiskR21CA116585 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ARSLAN, ALAN A. · 2008 to 2009
$381k
Time-Variant Effects of Cancer Risk Factors in Nested Case-Control StudiesR03CA153083 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LIU, MENGLING · 2010 to 2011
$179k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140632NCI NIH HHS R03 CA153083NCI NIH HHS R21 CA116585NCI NIH HHS R21 CA169739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major challenge in cancer epidemiologic studies, especially those of rare cancers, is observing enough cases. To address this, researchers often join forces by bringing multiple studies together to achieve large sample sizes, allowing for increased power in hypothesis testing, and improved efficiency in effect estimation. Combining studies, however, renders the analysis difficult owing to the presence of heterogeneity in the pooled data. In this article, motivated by a collaborative nested case-control (NCC) study of ovarian cancer in three cohorts from United States, Sweden, and Italy, we investigate the use of penalty regularized partial likelihood estimation in the context of pooled NCC studies to achieve two goals. First, we propose an adaptive group lasso (gLASSO) penalized approach to simultaneously identify important variables and estimate their effects. Second, we propose a composite agLASSO penalized approach to identify variables with heterogeneous effects. Both methods are readily implemented with the group coordinate gradient decent algorithm and shown to enjoy the oracle property. We conduct simulation studies to evaluate the performance of our proposed approaches in finite samples under various heterogeneity settings, and apply them to the pooled ovarian cancer study.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesData Interpretation, StatisticalProportional Hazards ModelsComputer SimulationFemaleHumansItalyLikelihood FunctionsOvarian NeoplasmsSwedenUnited StatesCox's proportional hazards modelGroup penaltyHeterogeneityNested case–control samplingOvarian cancerPooled studiesShrinkage estimation

Identifiers

PMID23632625
PMCPMC3841381
OpenAlexW2163695111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.