Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23632077›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion practice2014

Building partnerships in community-based participatory research: budgetary and other cost considerations.

Theresa J Hoeft, Wylie Burke, Scarlett E Hopkins, Walkie Charles, Susan B Trinidad, Rosalina D James, Bert B Boyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical Ethics Needs Assessment: Adapting Clinical Ethics to a Population Health Program.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Community dissemination and genetic research: moving beyond results reporting.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Theresa J Hoeft1University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA.
Wylie Burke
Scarlett E Hopkins
Walkie Charles
Susan B Trinidad
Rosalina D James
Bert B Boyer

Funding

Pharmacogenetics in Rural and Underserved PopulationsU01GM092676 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BURKE, WYLIE G., THUMMEL, KENNETH E. · 2010 to 2014
$9.9M
Training Geriatric Mental Health Services ResearchersT32MH073553 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI BRUCE, MARTHA L · 2005 to 2019
$6.4M
Pilot Project ProgramP30GM103325 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS · PI BERSAMIN, ANDREA · 2012 to 2016
$5.3M
Genetics of Obesity in Yup'ik EskimosR01DK074842 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS · PI BOYER, BERT BRANDON · 2007 to 2011
$2.8M
Ethics of Dissemination: Communicating with Participants about Genetics ResearchR01HG005221 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS · PI BOYER, BERT BRANDON, BURKE, WYLIE G. · 2010 to 2012
$1.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005221NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005221-01NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK074842NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103325NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM092676NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM092676-01NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH073553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is an important framework for partnering with communities to reduce health disparities. Working in partnership with community incurs additional costs, some that can be represented in a budget summary page and others that are tied to the competing demands placed on community and academic partners. These cost considerations can inform development of community-academic partnerships. We calculated costs from a case study based on an ongoing CBPR project involving a Community Planning Group (CPG) of community co-researchers in rural Alaska and a bicultural liaison group who help bridge communication between CPG and academic co-researchers. Budget considerations specific to CBPR include travel and other communication-related costs, compensation for community partners, and food served at meetings. We also identified sources of competing demands for community and academic partners. Our findings can inform budget discussions in community-academic partnerships. Discussions of competing demands on community partners' time can help plan timelines for CBPR projects. Our findings may also inform discussions about tenure and promotion policies that may represent barriers to participation in CBPR for academic researchers.

Indexed as

BudgetsAlaskaCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity NetworksHealth Status DisparitiesHumansIndians, North AmericanOrganizational Case StudiesProgram DevelopmentRural PopulationAlaska Native peoplecommunity advisory boardparticipatory research

Identifiers

PMID23632077
PMCPMC3778064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.