ArticlemBio2013
Light sensing in Aspergillus fumigatus highlights the case for establishing new models for fungal photobiology.
Article in mBio, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Light in the box-photobiological examination chamber with light trap ventilation system for studying fungal surface cultures illustrated with Metarhizium brunneum and Beauveria brongniartii.Fungal biology and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Article
- Phototoxicity of Ultraviolet-A against the WhiteflyOxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2021Article
- Fungal evolution: cellular, genomic and metabolic complexity.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020Article
- The Blue-Light PhotoreceptorApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbes inhabit diverse environmental locations, and many species need to shift their physiology between different niches. To do this effectively requires the accurate sensing of and response to the environment. For pathogens, exposure to light is one major change between a free-living saprophyte lifestyle and causation of disease within the host. However, how light may act as a signal to influence pathogenesis, on the side of either the host or the pathogen, is poorly understood. Research during the last 2 decades has uncovered aspects about the machinery for light sensing in a small number of fungi. Now, Fuller et al. have initiated studies into the role that light and two photosensor homologs play in the behavior of the ubiquitous fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus [K. K. Fuller, C. S. Ringelberg, J. J. Loros, and J. C. Dunlap, mBio 4(2):e00142-13, 2013, doi:10.1128/mBio.00142-13]. Light represses the germination of A. fumigatus spores and enhances resistance to ultraviolet light, oxidative stresses, and cell wall perturbations. The phenotypes of the strains with mutations in the LreA and FphA homologs revealed that these sensors control some, but not all, responses to light. Furthermore, interactions occur between blue and red light signaling pathways, as has been described for a related saprophytic species, Aspergillus nidulans. Genome-wide transcript analyses found that about 2.6% of genes increase or decrease their transcript levels in response to light. This use of A. fumigatus establishes common elements between model filamentous species and pathogenic species, underscoring the benefits of extending photobiology to new species of fungi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.